Talk:Lowry War

Lowry War has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 14, 2022	Good article nominee	Listed

Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Can we get some citations on here?

I am the great-great-great-granddaughter of James Brantley "Brant" Harris. I did not know that Grandpa Brant was a white man. I had been told that he was quite a womanizer, but I always pictured him in my mind as an Indian because we, his decendants, have a very strong Lumbee heritage also.If there is any information out there about who he was married to, or any other info, I would be interested in reading it. This article has fascinated me. Thank you. --204.250.5.87 (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harris had several Lumbee concubines. The Lumbee petition for federal recognition situates Harris in a Lumbee genealogy. I think you would probably have to go to the Indian resource center in that old school in Pembroke, NC to have a look at that genealogy.Verklempt (talk) 23:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lowry War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100327154552/http://www.sethkaller.net:80/catalogs/41-civil-war/427-henry-berry-lowrie-lowry-robin-hood-in-civil-war-north-carolina to http://www.sethkaller.net/catalogs/41-civil-war/427-henry-berry-lowrie-lowry-robin-hood-in-civil-war-north-carolina

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:15, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lowry War/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 15:02, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks interesting, will read shortly! One first comment to make the start, for now:

Optional: There are some extremely long sections which I would recommend to split up using additional headings. This just helps reading a lot, giving some orientation. And these long sections seem even longer when compared with the "Background" section, which is split into three short sections (I don't yet know if it makes sense to combine these, using introductory sentences to guide the reader instead of headings). --Jens Lallensack (talk) 15:02, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I've broken up the longest section with another header, but I'm having trouble finding other natural thematic cleavages to divide upon. If you have any suggestions for further breaks I'd be glad to hear them.
that the some gang members – word too much?
- Fixed.
transferred to the more secure, brick jail in Wilmington – comma too much?
- Fixed.
Stephen Lowry, Steve Lowry – you appear to use these interchangeably. It would be better to be consistent; wondering about the different choice of names disrupts reading flow, and I even fear some might think these are two separate people.
- Changed to "Steve". Sources use both but prefer Steve.
rose from an embankment on the side of a road shot John Taylor through the head – "and" missing?
- Fixed.
Could you provide unit conversions for the yards per MOS:CONVERSIONS? I personally have no idea how long 50 yards is.
- Done.
the Lowry Gang entered Lumberton and broke Tom Lowry and Forney Oxendine out of the county jail – I'm probably missing something, but I can't find the mention where Tom was captured and detained?
- Evans mention's Tom's escape from custody twice but never covers the circumstances of his capture.
I'm wondering a bit about the infobox. It lists 22 killed, but this also includes people that were not actually members of either party? On the same token, "2 arrested and released" doesn't include the woman?
- 22 killed of the authorities side of things (militiamen, posse members, etc.). The only way that would be inaccurate is if the Lowry Gang killed some "innocent bystanders" or a robbery victim that wasn't party to the conflict. The only odd case there would be Reuben King, but considering his status as former sheriff and his threats against the gang I think its fair to consider him a part of the anti-Lowry group (not to justify his murder though). This would not include Benjamin Bethea, an innocent man basically lynched by one of the posses. I do think Ahearn's calculation would include Barnes and Harris, though, and the infobox of course includes 1864 in the time frame. And yes the women are not included because the sources don't treat them as members of the gang. If this is all too confusing it can be removed the from the infobox, which is only supposed to concisely summarize the article, not create confusion!
@Indy beetle: That's all I could find. Excellent article, it is more than ready to be submitted to FAC. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 18:39, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jens Lallensack: I've responded to your comments. -Indy beetle (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks, all looks good, promoting now! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible photos/images

- Indy beetle (talk) 04:05, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]