Talk:Love Always/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 02:51, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- '
'Jodeci went on hiatus in 1996. This is rather ungrammatical, can you rewrite?- My grammar is not the best. What is ungrammatical about it? Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, I think I fixed it. Michael Jester (talk) 21:23, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
- My grammar is not the best. What is ungrammatical about it? Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Henderson called the album's ballads and slow jams "above average" but appreciated the 1970s soul music feel on the album. could do with re-writing, appears contradictory in tone.- I reworded it a little bit. Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
There are a number of single sentence and short paragraphs, which could do with consolidation in accordance with the MoS- I think I have fixed this. Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- '
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Statements are sourced to RS, no evidence of OR
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
They appeared as featured artists in songs including "How Do U Want It", This is one example - are there any others and why is Tupac Shakur not mentioned?- Added Tupac and added other single. Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- One imge used with suitable FUR rationale.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- On hold for seven days for issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:10, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- OK, this passes muster now. Listed as GA. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
I appreciate you for reviewing Love Always!
—Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)