Jump to content

Talk:Love Always/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 02:51, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    ''Jodeci went on hiatus in 1996. This is rather ungrammatical, can you rewrite?
    My grammar is not the best. What is ungrammatical about it? Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay, I think I fixed it. Michael Jester (talk) 21:23, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Henderson called the album's ballads and slow jams "above average" but appreciated the 1970s soul music feel on the album. could do with re-writing, appears contradictory in tone.
    I reworded it a little bit. Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    There are a number of single sentence and short paragraphs, which could do with consolidation in accordance with the MoS
    I think I have fixed this. Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Statements are sourced to RS, no evidence of OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    They appeared as featured artists in songs including "How Do U Want It", This is one example - are there any others and why is Tupac Shakur not mentioned?
    Added Tupac and added other single. Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    One imge used with suitable FUR rationale.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold for seven days for issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:10, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, this passes muster now. Listed as GA. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you for reviewing Love Always!
Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]