Talk:Love Always

Love Always has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 17, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
November 29, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

R&B and Soul Music Mid‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyedit complete

Just finished a copyedit in response to the request at the Guild of Copy Editors. The biggest change was to split the first paragraph of the "Production, writing, and recording" section in two for writing and production. Lagrange613 (talk) 01:35, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Love Always/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 02:51, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
'~~'Jodeci went on hiatus in 1996. This is rather ungrammatical, can you rewrite?~~
My grammar is not the best. What is ungrammatical about it? Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I think I fixed it. Michael Jester (talk) 21:23, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Henderson called the album's ballads and slow jams "above average" but appreciated the 1970s soul music feel on the album. could do with re-writing, appears contradictory in tone.
I reworded it a little bit. Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~There are a number of single sentence and short paragraphs, which could do with consolidation in accordance with the MoS~~
I think I have fixed this. Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Statements are sourced to RS, no evidence of OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
They appeared as featured artists in songs including "How Do U Want It", This is one example - are there any others and why is Tupac Shakur not mentioned?
Added Tupac and added other single. Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
One imge used with suitable FUR rationale.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On hold for seven days for issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:10, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, this passes muster now. Listed as GA. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you for reviewing Love Always!
—Michael Jester (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Love Always. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110616145338/http://www.ifpi.se/wp/wp-content/uploads/guld-platina-1987-1998.pdf to http://www.ifpi.se/wp/wp-content/uploads/guld-platina-1987-1998.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Love Always. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110809085537/http://www.theofficialcharts.com/artist/_/k-ci%20%26%20jojo/ to http://www.theofficialcharts.com/artist/_/k-ci%20%26%20jojo/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]