Talk:Loosey LaDuca/GA1

GA Review

Passed. voorts (talk/contributions) 16:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Voorts (talk · contribs) 14:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Review to come. voorts (talk/contributions) 14:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)~~[reply]

A few notes:

1b: The lead does not adequately summarize all relevant parts of the article per MOS:INTRO and MOS:LEADREL.
3a: The article goes into the main details of the topic, but I would like to see more in prose about what LaDuca has done post-Drag Race.
Some of the items listed in "Web series" appear to be media interviews. I don't think those are notable enough to be on that list.
Delete the second image. She's at the same event, wearing the same thing as the first image and doing the same pose.
Everything else meets the GA criteria. No copyvio per Earwig's tool. Spot check for OR and paraphrasing below.

Spot check

Ref 3 - good
Ref 1d - good
Ref 6 - good
Ref 10 - good
Ref 12 - good

Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 14:24, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Voorts Thanks for reviewing! I've removed the second image. However, I'm struggling to find more to add about her career post-Drag Race, as season 15 just ended in April. It is likely the subject will be touring and working on new projects soon, and I expect the Wikipedia entry will be updated appropriately. I understand where you are coming from re: web series, however, this entry seems to be in line with others about drag queens which have been promoted to Good status: Chi Chi DeVayne (web series), Gigi Goode (web series), Honey Davenport (internet series), Kameron Michaels (internet series), etc. That being said, if there are specific entries you want removed in order to promote the article, I can trim appropriately. Similarly, if there are any specific claims you feel must be mentioned in the lead, please let me know. Thanks again! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good RE post-Drag Race and the web series list. RE the lead, there should be something about her characterization on the show and about the fact that there was disappointment that she didn't make the finals. Also, regarding the "Personal life" section, is there anything more that you can include, perhaps citing to the the interviews listed in the web series section? voorts (talk/contributions) 15:15, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RE my last comment, that also applies to the "Early life and education" section. I don't think any of this is strictly needed for GA since the article doesn't need to be comprehensive and the main topic is LaDuca being a drag performer. voorts (talk/contributions) 15:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer not to add details from interviews but I will see what I can add to the intro. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:18, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Voorts: Is this what you had in mind? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:22, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was more thinking something like this. I also reorganized the article a bit. voorts (talk/contributions) 15:35, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any issues with my edit? If not, I would be happy to promote this. voorts (talk/contributions) 15:48, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me! Thanks again! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:57, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! If you have time, I have an FAC that needs a spot check and source review. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 16:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.