Talk:London United (basketball)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 11 April 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved and I think I have repaired the copy/paste moves from 2006 and 2007. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
London United → London United Basketball – not primary topic, London United Busways is arguably just as notable a topic. This page should be set up as a disambiguation page with Basketball, Busways and London United Tramways listed. Uncorneast (talk) 07:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support The pageview tool shows that the basketball team is definitely not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "London United". For example on the 28th of March received 52 views, London United Tramways received 5 and London United (the basketball team) received just 3. On the 25th of March it received zero views compared with 30 for London United Busways and 4 for London United Tramways. AusLondonder (talk) 23:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Is the team actually called London United Basketball since if not we would need to use something like London United (basketball)? In case anyone is wondering I am aware of WP:NATURAL but that says not to use orscure of made up names which would apply if basketball is not part of the teams' name.--64.229.167.158 (talk) 20:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support only if it is moved to the parenthetical title London United (basketball), per the IP 64.229.167.158's rationale, similar to the Texas Rangers (baseball) article. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:37, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Before a series of cut-and-paste moves, this article was actually about the bus company, and given the lack of interest in the basketball team it's clearly not reasonable to claim that the latter is the primary topic just because their land-grab of the title wasn't noticed/challenged at the time. ‑ Iridescent 09:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This page still has incoming links so if anyone wants to convert it to a disambiguation page, these links will need to be changed first. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:08, 18 April 2017 (UTC)