Talk:Logical framework

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Logical framework article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Philosophy: Logic Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

LF (logical framework)

This article mentions the `LF Logical Framework' all over the place, yet seems to refer to the Edinburgh Logical Framework specifically. IMO, this would seem to mislead the reader into think that ELF is the logical framework, when in fact there are many. Depending on one's culture and background (e.g, CMU / North America or Europe), one might use LF to refer to the Edinburgh Logical Framework, Martin-Löf's Logical Framework, or some other variant. The distinction between a `logical framework' as an abstract concept and an individual instance of a logical framework should really be made clearer in the article. 67.60.81.45 (talk) 01:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the article was pretty confused. I hope it's less so now. Tijfo098 (talk) 06:57, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RM

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LF (logical framework) → Logical framework — Redirects here and is the standard name of the method. Tijfo098 (talk) 06:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support seems to make sense. 65.93.12.101 (talk) 23:40, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Logical framework. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060104064335/http://www.hf.uio.no/filosofi/njpl/vol1no1/meaning/meaning.html to http://www.hf.uio.no/filosofi/njpl/vol1no1/meaning/meaning.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]