Talk:Logic of argumentation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 12 November 2013 by reviewer ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs).

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have added a link to this page under "see also" on the page on Argumentation. So this page is no longer an orphan. PhilipJudson (talk) 10:50, 18 December 2013 (UTC) I have now also added a couple of links from this page to others (toxicity, and xenobiotic metabolism). I do not understand how to remove the statements in the header that appears with the page stating that neither of the above kinds of links exist. I also do not understand why this page fails on notability. I've looked at lots of other pages that pass the test - some with only a single sentence on them - and cannot work out what I need to change. Any suggestions or offers to edit in changes? PhilipJudson (talk) 11:13, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]