Talk:Logic alphabet

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

The Logic Alphabet should be compared with other, historically competing "iconic" binary logical-connective notations like those of Charles S. Peirce, Jerome Frazee, G. Spencer Brown, and Glenn Clark, as well as other "operations on connectives" in work of Karl Menger, A. Stern's "Matrix Logic", and others. Also, Entitative Graphs, Existential Graphs, Conceptual Graphs, and VennLISP. Also, "logically onomatopoeic" connectives in certain constructed languages like Loglan and Lojban.

The Logic Alphabet, unlike some of its linear notation competitors, has the possible "defect" that symmetric binary connectives have logical symbols that are not left-right bilaterally symmetric.65.19.15.158 (talk) 10:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is rigt. Zellweger makes the same mistake like Boby Lapointe with his fr:Numération Bibi. Sorry, but I concider that rather primitive.

Greetings... --T.P. (talk) 21:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture avilable

File:Zellweger-LogicGarnet.jpg

Image:Zellweger-LogicGarnet.jpg

Saeed.Veradi 08:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Wow!

The Symbols shown under Content are a bit sparse. Aren’t they? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.229.109.29 (talk) 20:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]