Jump to content

Talk:Loch Ness Monster (roller coaster)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Newtothisedit (talk · contribs) 03:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll pick this up for review. Comments will be coming soon.--Newtothisedit (talk) 03:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

Comments

[edit]
  • "The Loch Ness Monster is the only remaining roller coaster with interlocking loops" Specify that its only remaining one in the world with interlocking loops, right now this could be interpreted as being the only remaining on in the park, country or world.
  • "The announcement followed expansion plans for the Anheuser-Busch brewery in Williamsburg" Link to Williamsburg
  • "athletes in American football, NASCAR racing, ice hockey, and stunt personnel" Add Wikilinks
  • "A week later on June 9, the park hosted the first American Coaster Enthusiasts (ACE) Convention, partially surrounding the roller coaster's opening." Specify that it was the first ever convention, right now it could be interpreted as the parks first convention.
  • "Parts of Python, the sister roller coaster to the Loch Ness Monster, were donated to the park after the former's closure" Add that Python was at Tampa Busch Gardens.

Great Job on this article, very well written and informative. Incidentally this is one of the first roller coasters I can vividly remember riding.--Newtothisedit (talk) 17:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Newtothisedit: I appreciate the review! Let me know if there are further corrections to make. I have not made it up to the U.S. northeast parks (besides Hersheypark back in '09) yet, but researching this roller coaster has made it all the more exciting to try to visit some of those theme parks soon. :) Adog (TalkCont) 17:40, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me, I'll pass it. Newtothisedit (talk) 17:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]