Talk:Literal English Version

Sources

This article requires better sources to establish notability of this translation. Apart from blogs and personal websites, the only sources are for tangential points about general translation issues. If better sources cannot be provided to establish notability, the article may be subject to deletion.--Jeffro77 (talk) 00:24, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this still applies. The lack of independent, deep sources specifically about this translation means that this book may not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK. Being based on World English Bible, which also has serious notability problems makes the situation worse. If WP:SECONDARY sources cannot be found the article should be deleted. If they cannot be found in depth, then the article could possible be merged with the WEB one, although since that also lacks sources, that could lead to additional problems. Grayfell (talk) 23:17, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously question the notoriety of any new "Translation" that amounts to a Find & Replace in a text editor with a copy of the World English Bible, there are a plethora of translations that fit this mold especially in the "Sacred Name Movement" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.220.91.36 (talk) 01:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]