Talk:Lists of UK top-ten singles

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Charts, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Record charts. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Record ChartsWikipedia:WikiProject Record ChartsTemplate:WikiProject Record ChartsRecord Charts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

How to continue these?

Guys, how does one continue these articles? I'd like to see them done, or to do them myself, but I can't find the sources online, and the links provided in the existing pages aren't very specific either. - Renaboss (talk) 18:15, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Renaboss: You can get any chart from http://www.officialcharts.com/charts/ by picking a date. Bearing in mind that there were several different charts in the 50s and 60s and that OCC's decision of which to pick is not universally accepted. Hope this helps - let me know if you want any help. Btljs (talk) 18:29, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Structure for top 10 lists

I have been doing lots of work on adding to and improving the individual top 10 list articles and have come up with a template structure. It is in my sandbox here. Obviously you will need to add references, images etc. but the look of the page really works in my opinion and having a consistent structure is what is needed. I am hoping to nominate some for featured list once complete. 03 md 22:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 October 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. bd2412 T 17:43, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other similar 62 pages to be renamed

– As with Talk:List of Billboard Hot 100 top-ten singles in 2018#Requested move 14 July 2018, it seems less confusing to use "top-ten" because the current titles could be interpreted as "list of the 10 most popular singles in $year". I would not be opposed to other changes, such as retitling all the articles to "List of top-ten singles in $year (UK)", "List of UK top-ten songs in $year" or "List or "List of UK Singles Chart top-ten singles in $year". Jc86035 (talk) 15:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. –Ammarpad (talk) 17:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support, reluctantly, because on its face it seems so trivial that it's not worth it. However, I must agree that the current titles could be easily mis-interpreted to mean "list of the 10 most popular singles in year YYYY" rather than "lists of all songs that made the top-ten at some point in year YYYY". I think the current natural disambiguation is preferred to using UK in parenthetic disambiguation. --В²C ☎ 18:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Would inserting the word "all" make it even more clear? "List of all UK top-10 singles in YYYY"? --В²C ☎ 19:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If the verdict is "support", someone better write a script or a bot to make so many moves. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Anthony Appleyard: It would only take about eight to twelve minutes to do it manually, which is probably about the same amount of time it would take to make a bot request. Jc86035 (talk) 18:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.