Jump to content

Talk:Listed buildings in Rivington

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listListed buildings in Rivington is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on February 3, 2017.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 10, 2010Featured list candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 27, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the listed buildings in Rivington include a replica of Liverpool Castle and the Pigeon Tower (pictured)?

Unnecessary text?

[edit]

I've moved this paragraph here from the article. I don't think it's necessary to include this as it's covered in Listed building but others may think differently. --Northernhenge (talk) 19:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The term "listed building", in the United Kingdom, refers to a building or structure designated as being of special architectural, historical, or cultural significance. They are categorised in three grades: Grade I consists of buildings of outstanding architectural or historical interest, Grade II* includes significant buildings of more than local interest and Grade II consists of buildings of special architectural or historical interest. Buildings in England are listed by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport on recommendations provided by English Heritage, which also determines the grading.[1]

Hi, I've reverted your edit (WP:BRD). In featured lists it is common to provide a brief overview of the general subject for readers' understanding. The explanation of the term listed building has been used in many featured lists about listed buildings, such as Grade I listed buildings in Mendip, Listed buildings in Widnes, and Listed buildings in Runcorn (urban area). I do think that perhaps the explanation should be moved further down the page. Your thoughts? Also, feel free to comment at the article's featured list candidacy. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 19:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi to you both, thanks for taking an interest in this article. I have copied the format from articles such as Listed buildings in Runcorn (urban area) and other featured lists which include something similar. I would be happy to move the explanation.--J3Mrs (talk) 19:53, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The new location of the explanation is much better, thanks. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:58, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it doesn't look out of place now. It's a good outcome. --Northernhenge (talk) 21:35, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, much better, good suggestion, thanks to you both.--J3Mrs (talk) 21:50, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Listed buildings, English Heritage, retrieved 2010-07-15
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Listed buildings in Rivington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]