Talk:Listed buildings in Anderton, Lancashire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright problem

This article was tagged for copyright problems on October 28th and listed for administrator review. It has now come due for closure. Comparison with the various sources suggests that content may closely follow the originals in terms of structure and language. While I have not examined every subpage, the three I've looked at show that the article follows the sources quite closely and that the concerns are substantiated. To highlight these similarities, I present several passages, with content removed and some bolding to draw particular attention:

Article:

A squared sandstone with quoins, stone slate roofs. L-shaped plan from 1759 Two storeys, lintel of the 2-light window at first floor above the door is inscribed 0S M 1759. The gable has a worn datestone with letter F, a doorway and a window dated 1683. The interior has a timber framed partition with remains of a cruck blade at ground floor of the north end...

source:

Squared sandstone with quoins, stone slate roofs. L-shaped plan formed by addition of 1759 at right angles to west gable of earlier building. Two storeys...the lintel of the 2-light window at 1st floor above the door is inscribed 0S M 1759...the gable incorporating a worn datestone lettered in relief (?) F, a doorway and a window in the 1683...The interior of this part has a timber framed partition with remains of a cruck blade at ground floor of the north end

Article:

Dated 1710 it is a Farmhouse and cottage in one dwelling. There is internal evidence of an earlier building, cottage dated to eightenth century and since altered. Constructed of Squared sandstone with quoins and a slate roof. Date on rectangular lintels with raised lettering in recessed panels S one I M; 1710 and features a very prominent large gabled stair turret with a vertical rectangular stairlight and an oeil-de-boeuf at attic level and a tall corner chimney'. The interior has an inglenook with stone heck and bressummer with tongue-stopped ovolo moulding and lateral beams similarly decorated with a partition wall between these being a braced wattle and daub. The front end of the tie-beam of a large roof truss is joined to the jowelled head of a wall post indicating a former timber-framed building

Source:

Farmhouse and cottage, now all one dwelling. Dated 1710 on lintel of door, but with some internal evidence of earlier building.... Squared sandstone with quoins, slate roof....plain doorway at right hand end has large rectangular lintel with raised lettering in recessed panels S one I M; 1710...then a very prominent large gabled stair turret with a vertical rectangular stairlight and an oeil-de-boeuf at attic level...and a tall corner chimney.... Interior: housepart in 2nd bay has inglenook with stone heck and bressummer with tongue-stopped ovolo moulding, 2 lateral beams similarly decorated...partition wall between these contains braced large framing with wattle and daub...the front end of the tie-beam of a large roof truss is joined to the jowelled head of a wall post (suggesting former timber-framed construction)

Article:

The farmhouse is probably seventeenth century and has been altered and enlarged at an early period. The build is coursed sandstone rubble and squared stone, with quoins, slate roof with stone gable copings and gable chimneys. Right gable wall has a doorway near the front corner with chamfered surround and pointed Tudor-arched head, now covered by an added lean-to. A partition wall to the rear outshut appears to be timber-framed. The adjoining barn has lintel of former doorway with raised lettering G possibly I P : 1703.

Source

Farmhouse, probably C17, altered and enlarged at an early period. Coursed sandstone rubble and squared stone, with quoins, slate roof with stone
gable copings and gable chimneys. ... Right gable wall has a doorway near the front corner with chamfered surround and pointed Tudor-arched head, now
covered by an added lean-to. ...the partition wall to the rear outshut appears to be timber-framed. History: not known, but adjoining barn has lintel of former doorway with raised lettering G possibly I P :1703

The third of these, obviously, follows particularly closely, but cumulatively there are problems throughout. While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are.

I have confirmed that the hosting website claims copyright of their content, here. If the material can be verified to be public domain or permission is provided, we can use the original text with proper attribution. (Our plagiarism guidelines require that direct copying from public domain sources be acknowledged.)

If the material cannot be verified to be public domain or permission is not provided, this article should be rewritten in the temporary space that is now linked from the article's front so that it will not constitute a derivative work. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

I am relisting the article so that it can be revisited after a week to see if these problems have been addressed. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:48, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been rewritten and reformatted so should not now be guilty of any copyvio. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 21:22, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Listed buildings in Anderton, Lancashire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6Dus2kPHo?url=http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/listing/listed-buildings/ to http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/listing/listed-buildings/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]