Talk:List of trade unions in the Singareni coal fields

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 August 2011. The result of the discussion was Speedy Keep.

India: Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Organized Labour Mid‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed prod tag

I removed the prod tag. Although the article can be improved and referenced, the subject is notable. This is not "a certain coal field" as stated in prod nomination, but an area of 59 separate mines in three districts (http://books.google.com/books?id=Rh4TOzv2toMC&pg=PA9 ). http://books.google.com/books?id=Rh4TOzv2toMC provides a good basis for referencing the article. --Soman (talk) 00:48, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Singareni coal fields are notable, and there is an article about them. But that doesn't mean there should be a list of trade unions for it. I do not see any similar articles like 'List of trade unions at General Motors' or 'List of trade unions in Peruvian copper mines'. Do you agree?

I can also put it in AfD and see what other editors have to say about it. What do you think? MakeSense64 (talk) 06:31, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to improve referencing and wikify the article somewhat shortly, and respond at the AfD. As per the question, yes I would say that GM or Peruvian mining might very well have such lists, in case there have been a rather large number of unions there. --Soman (talk) 16:20, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of trade unions in the Singareni coal fields. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001134919/http://www.cpimlnd.org/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=250 to http://www.cpimlnd.org/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=250

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]