Talk:List of tied One Day Internationals
Appearance
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
List of tied One Day Internationals is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Rename?
[edit]Suggest moving this to List of tied One-day Internationals which is standard capitalisation. See One-day International. -- Ian ≡ talk 12:05, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Footnotes
[edit]Comment: It's hard to work out which footnotes apply to which match, because they're not numbered. Is there a better way to do them? Stephen Turner (Talk) 14:58, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Won by fewer wickets
[edit]Contrary to what was in the article before, neither of these two games were in tournaments. —Raven42 (talk) 02:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Featured lists that have not appeared on the main page
- FL-Class List articles
- Unknown-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles
- FL-Class cricket articles
- Low-importance cricket articles
- FL-Class cricket articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Cricket articles