Talk:List of taxa with candidatus status
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of taxa with candidatus status article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
AfC Reviewer Note
[edit]Approval of AfC was done on the basis that this appears to be a sensible WP:SPINOFF of candidatus, Candidate division, or another article. I have no opinion on whether a merger would be appropriate. --joe deckertalk 02:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Excel List
[edit]An Excel List ist provided with Table S1 there:
- Cindy J. Castelle, Jillian F. Banfield: Major New Microbial Groups Expand Diversity and Alter our Understanding of the Tree of Life. Cell Perspective, Vol. 172, No. 6, pp1181–1197, 8 March 2018, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.016; esp. Tbl. S1
Summary of new potentially phylum-level groups described based on genomes from metagenomes or single cells (or concentrates).
Please, can an expert check and possibly merge this information? Thanks in advance. --Ernsts (talk) 14:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)