Jump to content

Talk:List of tallest buildings in Singapore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured listList of tallest buildings in Singapore is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 8, 2009Featured list candidatePromoted
June 5, 2017Featured list removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Former featured list

Samsung Hub

[edit]

There is a number 5, Sumsung Hub right in between 23 and 24. Should the rest be moved down?GavinTing 09:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One Raffles Quay

[edit]

Aren't the One Raffles Quay North and South towers already completed? Shouldn't the North tower entry in the "Under Construction" list be moved to the Completed list? Lowjoel 12:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raising the maximum height limit?

[edit]

there was discussion about raising the 280M limit, but the air authorities were only willing to increase that ceiling but a little. it the end, it was view that a moderate increase in height limit would not do much to improve the skyline, especially when compared to the height of the tallest builing in the world. so the 280M limit was retain. Akinkhoo (talk) 15:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:New Singapore downtown possible look.png

[edit]

Image:New Singapore downtown possible look.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Marina Bay Financial Centre artist impression.jpg

[edit]

Image:Marina Bay Financial Centre artist impression.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poor Writing

[edit]

"The highest natural point in Singapore is at 161 metres high, which is relatively low compared to other countries. This is partly due to Singapore's particularly flat terrain."

That's not an explanation, it's stating the same fact in different words. The fact that Singapore has a relatively low highest point is not "partly due" to the fact that Singapore is particularly flat; you might as well say that Singapore is particularly flat because it has a low highest point. It's like saying that someone flies into rages a lot because they have an angry disposition, or that ice cream is bad for you because it has a deleterious effect on your health. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.127.136 (talk) 07:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"The city-state of Singapore has over 4,300 completed high-rises, the majority of which are located in the Downtown Core."

If more than 4300 building qualify for high-rise statement, it can't be right that the majority is located in the DC. I suspect that many HDB blocks and condos are counted in, in which case the majority of high-rises is spread out all over the city (country?), with only some form of denser clustering (but not a majority) in the DC. Sejtam (talk) 16:07, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Asia Square

[edit]

Tower 1 is done - at 221m - and I believe should be the 10th tallest, however I haven't been able to find a simple way to increment the list of each number below this by one automatically. Anyone have an easy trick to do that?  7  06:48, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of tallest bridges in the world which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of tallest buildings in Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of tallest buildings in Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of tallest buildings in Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of tallest buildings in Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Singapore&oldid=1208304363"