Talk:List of public art in Wiltshire

Wiltshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts: Public art

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[George V#Coronation|Coronation of George V]] Anchor George V#Coronation links to a specific web page: Coronations in Norway.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Question

Yes! I once made a draft that had the same name as this page about a year ago on my computer but lost all my work. Additionally, it only featured works in West Wiltshire. The question I'm asking concerns how do we treat villages? Some of them have their own public art but shall they have their own sections or maybe sub-sections?--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 22:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of public art in Wiltshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150923202915/http://www.chippenham.gov.uk/history-of-the-yelde-hall.9519.aspx to http://www.chippenham.gov.uk/history-of-the-yelde-hall.9519.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

PumpkinTower.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the list link straight to one resolution of the photo, thus making access to other sizes difficult?

I think it should link to all sizes, but there is nothing to show they exist. The list has this for the Calf, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8a/%27Calf%27_-_geograph.org.uk_-_4113238.jpg/1082px-%27Calf%27_-_geograph.org.uk_-_4113238.jpg, Other sizes would be preferable, such as: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8a/%27Calf%27_-_geograph.org.uk_-_4113238.jpg

The same for this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_public_art_in_Wiltshire#/media/File%3AQuasi-trompe-l'oeil_in_Trowbridge.jpg which is only one of several sizes. But there is no way to link to the complete media page for the item. This is strange. Nlight2 (talk) 20:40, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]