Talk:List of plant communities in the British National Vegetation Classification

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biota of Great Britain and Ireland (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and Ireland, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Biota of Great Britain and IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandBiota of Great Britain and Ireland articles

Ecology Mid‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Over-long links

Some of the red links here are very long. I wonder if they couldn't all be abbreviated in the form NVC-M29? Andy Mabbett 11:24, 7 October 2005 (UTC:)

I'd prefer the article titles themselves to be as complete as possible. However, I take your point - I assume the main issue is the need to avoid other editors fingers' wearing out? If so, I think redirects are probably the way forward. :)The form above seems a little too abbreviated (conceivably NVC-M29 could actually be something other than a plant community?X) "NVC Community M29" would be both brief and sufficiently unique. Open to suggestions though. SP-KP 11:53, 7 October 2005 (UTC:)

Expansion suggestion

Subcommunities could be added, as could subgroupings of the main groups (e.g. the different geographical groups of calcicolous grassland:) SP-KP 22:06, 2 May 2006 (UTC:)

):D:P:O;)XDXPX)XO

Progress

Date	Done	Still to do
	0	286
1/12/06	33	253
3/12/06	39	247
21/1/07	49	237
28/1/07	55	231
12/2/07	60	226
11/3/07	65	221
2/5/08	69	217

Upward merging

Can we keep these to one article for each community type, listing just the communities of that type and their constant species, rather than having one article for each community with very little information on each and no hope of expansion? Chris cheese whine 03:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As an example, see Woodland and scrub communities in the British National Vegetation Classification system. The other community types should probably all be structured in this way. Chris cheese whine 03:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any progress on the upmerging yet? Chris cheese whine 23:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salt Marsh

It now appears that you can download and use a chunk of volume 5, dealing with salt marsh, for free from the JNCC at [1]. It appears that volume 5 is the only volume available as an ebook, [2]. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anon998877 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

What does "Br.-Bl" mean?

I can't seem to find a description of this subscript, and I would think it valuable to define here. Anyone? Al Begamut (talk) 21:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]