This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
The mark-up using the large vertical bar makes the list difficult to read, use of a bullet mark would be better or leave as is with the comma delimiter Keith D19:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I know that "places" is ambiguous, but surely including monuments, buildings, railway stations, schools, and natural features etc. is a bit of a stretch (although I would acknowledge that there are some exceptional cases; I also think that historical fortifications that were once inhabited i.e. Furness Abbey and Ambleside Roman Fort should remain, and the islands should too). I would propose that any area with multiple dwellings and a name should be considered a place. In addition to this, it must be either isolated (a number of these places are farms with a few houses dotted around, but their isolation clearly defines them as independent areas) and/or independent, self-sufficient, or widely recognized as existing in its own right (key example would be Roose, which is technically a suburb of Barrow, but appears on maps etc. independently). Yohan euan o4 (talk) 21:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've been wondering about that because I noticed a hill (Yarlside) included, but I don't want to remove it because there might be another Yarlside that is a "place". Dbfirs20:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I know this is an exceptionally long time in which to respond (I haven't visited this page in years, and am still none the wiser!) - apart from the hill there's a Yarlside Road and school in Barrow. I'll probably delete it. Yohan euan o4 (talk) 01:13, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's OK, I'm still wondering. There are absolutely no houses on the hill Yarlside, and usually no people, not even walkers. I know because I've climbed it, and there's nothing there but sheep! Dbfirs08:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]