Talk:List of national constitutions

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of national constitutions article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles

WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Check out the article alerts; see if anything catches your fancy.
Cleanup : clean-up listing for Countries
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stubs by region.
Other : add {{WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Basic Laws of Israel#The Harari Decision|1950]] The anchor (#The Harari Decision) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Superseded Constitutions

There are some countries in the list of "codified constitutions (still in use today)" whose constitutions have been suspended or superseded by other law calling for a new constitution to be drafted. This would include:

Egypt
Tunisia
Fiji
Somalia?

Not sure if the list is complete. Shouldn't these countries be removed from the list during the interim until the replacement constitution becomes law, on the grounds that their constitutions are not still in use? Kyle Cronan (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 06:12, 13 October 2013

Paraguay

Why doesn't the paraguayan constitution appear in this list? --Mauricio Maluff 22:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Discussion

A discussion has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries/Lists of countries which could affect the inclusion criteria and title of this and other lists of countries. Editors are invited to participate. Pfainuk talk 13:32, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-sovereign constitutions

People keep adding non-sovereign constitutions to the main list:

If there is not already a separate page for it, it might be worth creating one more table for regional sub-national constitutions. In any case, keep your eyes open for non-sovereign bodies on the main list. samwaltz (talk) 12:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The United Kingdom didn't exist in 1215.2.101.148.7 (talk) 00:09, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Lance Tyrell[reply]

Canada's Constitution: 1867, not 1982

While the Canadian constitution was patriated in 1982, it has existed as a written document since 1867 (retitled from the British North America Act, 1867 to the Constitution Act, 1867 by the 1982 Act). See the article [Constitution of Canada].

This is also in line with the date of 1900 given for the Australian constitution. Ross Fraser (talk) 09:24, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Language(s) of each constitution

I believe it would be helpful to create another column for the original language or languages of the authentic copy of each constitution. តាំង ប៊ុនហុង (talk) 14:25, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution rule

The country must divided two date are:

First constitution (date): original constitution [where it was first time created]
Current constitution (date): valid constitution (original or amendment constitution)

Akuindo (talk) 07:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of national constitutions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130723131521/http://mola.gov.om/Nen.pdf to http://mola.gov.om/Nen.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Countries without constitutions

Why would we list countries without constitutions in a list of national constitutions? This is completely outside the scope of the article. ~ GB fan 15:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not understand the "why" then it is your duty to learn what the meaning is - this is the purpose of Wikipedia. You have no right to destroy knowledge just because you don't understand it. The point is that a common educational technique when teaching a subject is to also teach what it is not. Be careful of your idea about what "scope" means - in this case it does not apply. Thanks. -- DHT863 (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I completely understand what scope means in the context of this article. This is an article about nations that have constitutions not ones that don't. If you feel we need a list of countries that don't have constitutions, create a new article about that. ~ GB fan 15:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read what I said. Didn't it make sense to you? The topic of this article is "constitutions" and it is vital information to show what countries don't have to contrast and compare. Don't take this personal but deleting information is evil. You are perfectly free to extract my info and create another page according to your believes or give the section a more appropriate title or anything else besides destroying information - that is a god awful terrible thing. Please explain to this novice exactly what is the meaning of scope and how does that apply in this case. -- DHT863 (talk) 15:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't destroy any information, I removed it from the visible article because it is outside what this article is about (scope definition 1). If you feel the information you are adding here is important then you can create a new article. It is not my job or responsibility to create an article that you think is important. ~ GB fan 16:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is your job and your responsibility to enable, protect, and defend knowledge. The only way to do that is to build up with the info I provided. Are you able to explain in your own words what is "scope definition 1" ? Is your job considered to go around searching for imaginary violations of "scope"? Just curious but exactly how much knowledge and information have you added to Wikipedia this year? -- DHT863 (talk) 16:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You do not get to dictate to me what my job or responsibilities are, I am a volunteer and get to decide what I do. No one can tell me what my job or responsibilities are. Can I explain that definition in my own words, yes I can. Am I going to do it, no I am not. You can look at my contributions to see what I do whenever you want. ~ GB fan 17:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reading my suggestions. You have been informed. -- DHT863 (talk) 00:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have been informed of what? ~ GB fan 01:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Word counts

Hello, my name is Rebestalic

Should I add a word count column to the existing table for sovereign states? Or is that irrelevant I'm assuming this talk page is unattended to, so I shall go ahead--I will be checking on this page every now and then for replies.

Rebestalic^{[dubious—discuss]} 11:06, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. word count

The United States's Constitution is listed as 4,543 words, which is the typical number given by many online sources. This number only includes the original seven articles ratified in 1788. The United States Constitution with all subsequent amendments actually contains 7,762 words, which is also the number given in the cited source at the top of the word count column. I don't know if there's a specific reason for this but I've switched the numbers to make it more accurate, since amendments to the U.S. constitution have the exact same legal status as the original articles.SwensonJ (talk) 19:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is the 1688 Bill of Rights not a Constitution?

Or the Magna Carta? Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 21:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]