Talk:List of maritime boundary treaties

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notable omissions

1824 and 1825 treaties re 54-40, Russia with UK/US
Oregon Treaty created main Maritime boundary between BC and Wash
San Juans dispute, Treaty of Washington (1871) resolved vagueness of Oregon Treaty
1903 Alaska boundary settlement - established A-B Line, t he Maritime boundary in the Dixon Entrance and also boundary between various islands
the Bering Sea Arbitration re boundaries/ jurisdiction in the Bering Sea.

There's more....right now I'm busy removing all the flag-junk which cluttered this page ridiculously. Just because a country's name is mentioend doesn't mean its flag has to be waved.....Skookum1 (talk) 21:34, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- I see no one else has taken interest in this in the four year since I posted it; I'll add them all soon/later.Skookum1 (talk) 03:27, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should be arranged by ocean/sea, not continent

Some entries wind up being on the page twice, e.g. US-USSR treaties....and I'm uncomfortable seeing Israel, Jordan and Yemen in an "Asia" section, or to see Italy, Malta and Cyprus show up on the "Africa" section. It makes more sense to have divisions by ocean - e.g. by Indian Ocean, Mediterranean Sea, Black Sea, North Pacific, South Pacific, Caribbean, South Atlantic, North Atlantic, Baltic Sea and so on.22:11, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Brooks (away from a shore) do not play a role in maritime boundaries: proposal to remove Dutch-German agreement relating to two brooks

Why is the 29 Sep 1975 and 24 Nov 1975 agreement between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Federal Republic of Germany, about the boundary course at/in/through/next to two brooks listed here? If my understanding of the Wikipedia article on maritime boundaries is correct, a boundary at/in/through/next to surface waters of rivers and - supposedly - brooks do not constitute a maritime boundary. I propose to remove it from the table.Redav (talk) 15:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]