Talk:List of mammals of Sardinia

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Capitalization question

Hey @Donkey8: Why the preference for capitalization of "introduced"? The Wikipedia style is to use lower case. See the lead of MOS:CAPS where it says "Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization. In English, capitalization is primarily needed for proper names, acronyms, and for the first letter of a sentence." Thanks, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 18:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with List of mammals of Italy?

This list seems kind of pointless when we already have a list of the entire country's mammals. Ddum5347 (talk) 16:38, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which extinct mammals to include?

@Hemiauchenia: Among all the lists in the "Lists of xxx of Xxxx" series, usually the decision has been made to only include species which went extinct after 1500. This isn't a set rule, though I've been thinking about trying to make it one (see User:SchreiberBike/sandbox#Inclusion criteria for List of organisms of Place). Your point about Sardinia being different in having so many introduced species is important though. One way this has been handled has been to have a separate section for extinct species. The reasoning for this is that when people are looking for a list of animals (or whatever), they are generally expecting to see a list of what's there now. What do you think. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 23:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think including the extinct species in their own separate section is a fair compromise that I have no issue with. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to make the changes, or shall I? SchreiberBike | ⌨ 02:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on mobile atm so it's probably easier if you make the changes Hemiauchenia (talk) 03:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done SchreiberBike | ⌨ 03:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]