Talk:List of largest land carnivorans

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Add Section for Extinct Land Carnivores

I think given a title like this it is reasonable to expect to find extinct animals here (eg. large carnivorous arkhosaurs) I certainly came here expecting to find extinct species. Given this I propose we should split this article into two sections, a section for extant carnivores, and a section for extinct carnivores, and to add to that latter list. Melias C (talk) 15:35, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of wrong information!

The largest Tiger ever was 423kg and that is confirmed and undisputed. Also the average weight of the animals is incorrect. The 375kg lion was not found in the wild but in captivity and was indeed not confirmed.

Please correct this information, I have reputable sources (studies and research papers) to give you correct information 27.97.249.40 (talk) 13:29, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let's have the sources then. Exact cites please. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:52, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"List of largest land carnivores" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect List of largest land carnivores and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 1 § List of largest land carnivores until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 14:14, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's the issue with the expansions?

@SilverTiger12 and Ishan87: You two are edit-warring and not discussing. Specifically, I would like to hear what SilverTiger12's specific objection to the list expansions are? I'm not a fan of these "biggest/heaviest/meanest" lists in general because they frankly attract ill-informed editing, but I do not see a discussion (much less a consensus) anywhere that this list needs to be limited to ten entries. Or for that matter, that List of largest land carnivorans cannot have a column with distribution maps. If there is no existing consensus to point to and you insist that changes be discussed, you need to start a discussion and provide your reasons. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:47, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page is missing the Kodiak Brown Bear

The Kodiak bear is up to 1,656 lb in size and larger than a Polar bear

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kodiak_bear Ruly1000 (talk) 17:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Liger without Tigon

Why is the Liger listed, but not the Tigon, when the two are different, and have different sizes, with the Tigon still being larger than some of the other carnivores on the list? It doesn't make sense! Either both should be listed, or neither (as they both hybrids which only exist in captivity)? FillsHerTease (talk) 02:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

pandas are not carnivores 190.85.153.156 (talk) 11:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Table list

Why are the images on the left side? Also, why does the Liger's part have a caption on it? Shouldn't they be in the center? I tried doing that but it resulted to downscaling the images, so I reverted it instead of upscaling the images. It will waste too much time if the tried upscaling it. G0dzillaboy02 (talk) 11:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add weights in pounds

There needs to be a pounds listing so people who use pounds don't get confused when they see kg weights. Trimetwes fan1003 (talk) 08:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]