Jump to content

Talk:List of largest hydroelectric power stations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Numerical rankings

[edit]

Am I missing something? Aren't the numerical rankings supposed to correspond to the total capacity? 199.91.34.33 (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, some one made a mistake in adding a dam, so I changed it, but then I messed up the ranking, help me please. Calvingao (talk) 03:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help

[edit]

AMTRYING TO FINE OUT IN THE LATE 1990'S WHAT PLACE DID OREGON RANK IN THE USA HYDRCELECTRIC PRODUCTION —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.224.211.118 (talk) 22:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wut about teh Aussie one? XXx NoobSlayer xXx (talk) 03:15, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed segmenting

[edit]

Hello. Please have your say at the proposed segmenting of this article. Do respond there. Thanks. Rehman(+) 12:34, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Table for under construction dams

[edit]

There should be a table for dams under construction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simfan34 (talkcontribs) 21:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-off

[edit]

As we already have List of conventional hydroelectric power stations and it was decided to keep both articles, i think this article should be concentrated to largest power stations only. Now this article has 2 000 MW border and noted article 1000 MW. I think we can raise this article border to 3 000 MW and continue to add more data to these largest power stations. --Jklamo (talk) 20:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Snowy River Hydro Scheme

[edit]

In Australia the Snowy River Hydro Scheme is about 3500 MW capacity, but doesnt make the list ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.211.86 (talk) 06:09, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of largest hydroelectric power stations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Bourassa Dam

[edit]

It doesn't make sense to separate Robert Bourassa and La Grande 2-A. Both are simply separate turbine/generator complexes at the same dam, with 2-A being a second phase. Many other dams, like Guri and Grand Coulee, have had later phases add capacity to the dam, and none of them are counted as separate power stations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dgwohu (talkcontribs) 19:57, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Xiangjiaba Dam is 7750 MW

[edit]

Xiangjiaba Dam is 7750 MW

The power station’s installed capacity is 7.75 million kilowatts (eight 800-megawatt giant turbines and three large-scale turbines of 450,000 kilowatts), and the average annual power generation is 30.747 billion kilowatt-hours.

https://www.reduper.com/industry/energy/power-station/hydro/xiangjiaba-dam/ 2001:B011:C040:2444:989B:6271:875:3A3C (talk) 17:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]