Talk:List of joint winners of the Hugo and Nebula awards

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

format

How to format the Serenity entry? It won the 2005 Nebula for “Best Script” and the 2006 Hugo for “Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form”. My original entry made that clear, but it was a bit cumbersome. The current form is just unwieldly. Horovits 16:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the list should be broken into sections by category: Novel, Novella, Novelette, Short Story, etc. Each section should begin with a paragraph describing the category: number of words or whatever. Some works will appear in twice on the page due to differences in the way Hugo/Nebula define categories. This format would allow for adding more textual information about categories, differences between Hugo and Nebula, and perhaps even some info for each book.

As it stands, the list functions only as a chonological index, which isn't often useful. KennyLucius 15:24, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, the current form is fine; it links to Hugo Award and Nebula Award and to the individual works and their creators. What else is needed or wanted? Horovits

Then again, maybe a table heading that explains the date as in:

Hugo/Nebula Type Name Author

1966/1965 Novel: Dune by Frank Herbert

could be handy. Explain why most entries have two dates and why some have two categories. Is a full table needed for this? Horovits 02:14, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A table might look like this:

This is a **list of the works that have won both the Hugo Award and the Nebula Award**, awarded annually to works of science fiction literature.
Hugo/Nebula Awarded^*	Category	Title	Author
1966/1965	Novel	Dune	Frank Herbert
1966/1965	Short Fiction/Short Story^**	“Repent, Harlequin!” Said the Ticktockman	Harlan Ellison

^*When two dates are given, the first is the year the for which Hugo was awarded and the second is for the Nebula.

^**Because of the different definitions used by the Hugo and Nebula awards, some works have two categories listed; the first is the one it won the Hugo under, the second, the Nebula.

Horovits 02:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

years

There should be a note explaining why they used to be in different years, and now have converged to the same year. -69.87.200.57 (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

article title ("joint winners")?

The title of this article, List of joint winners of the Hugo and Nebula awards, is I believe inaccurate. The phrase "joint winners" suggest two or more literary works that shared a prize. But the article isn't about that at all. A better title might be List of works that won the Hugo Award and the Nebula Award.

Compare List of films that won the Golden Globe and the Oscar for Best Picture. Possibly you could insert the word "both" in there after "won".

Mathew5000 (talk) 00:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finalists

I feel we should in some way acknowledge works that were nominated for both the Hugo and Nebula, but did not necessarily win both or either. (ex: "Devil You Don't Know"). Thoughts? DS (talk) 03:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Young Adult fiction

According to Lodestar Award for Best Young Adult Book: The nomination and selection process is administered by the World Science Fiction Society (WSFS) represented by the current Worldcon committee, and the award is presented at the Hugo Award ceremony at the Worldcon, although it is not itself a Hugo Award. And consequently, Hugo Award doesn't list it either. So technically, this section should be removed. Thoughts? 165.1.194.41 (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

True, technically it shouldn't be here. On the other hand, readers of this page are likely interested in the Lodestar due to its close connection with the Hugo Awards, so it would also be reasonable to leave the section in with a note explaining that it isn't really a Hugo. Dan Bloch (talk) 13:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Authors with multiple joint wins

This information would be useful somewhere in this page. Perhaps sorted by number of appearances. This could be a part of a list of authors who appear here. 108.41.206.160 (talk) 04:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]