Talk:List of geological phenomena

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:List of geological phenomena is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Sediment#Formation|Sedimentary formation]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

From PNA/Geology

Geological phenomenon is this article useful? Maybe List of geological phenomena? Maybe should be deleted? Gwimpey 00:29, 10 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Moved. Someone please flesh out the list. --Smack 16:51, 11 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

List expanded. - RJH 20:35, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I can't imagine that it's anywhere nearly comprehensive at present. --Smack (talk) 00:43, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I imposed some structure on the list, incorporating all of the entries that were in there before. Still... I'm not sure that this is a useful list. "Geological Phenomenon" is a self-defining phrase, and efforts that go into expanding/organizing this list could perhaps be better spent in working on the Geology entry. Ethan 05:26, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My vote is that it should be moved to Geology--Cjackb 23:25, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very stale conversation, but I also agree a merger could help. Chris857 (talk) 03:53, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article now flagged for deletion

Not notable, neglected, nearly orphaned. DanHobley (talk) 06:24, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per DanHobley. --Tobias1984 (talk) 12:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]