Talk:List of generating stations in Alberta
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of generating stations in Alberta article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of generating stations in Alberta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100813120850/http://www.industcards.com/st-other-canada.htm to http://www.industcards.com/st-other-canada.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090114014758/http://www.acciona-energia.com/default.asp?x=0002020101&lang=En to http://www.acciona-energia.com/default.asp?x=0002020101&lang=En
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
ERV4 and ERV6 Online?
[edit]AESO lists them as active generating capacity and they have both generated 20MW for some periods (late September).[1]https://www.aeso.ca/market/market-updates/2023/new-asset-chappice-lake-chp1-notice-2/ See also Dispatcho [2]https://www.dispatcho.app/live/ERV6?b=1695810720&e=1696081800 Braillegrenade (talk) 20:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- I agree that they are operational. They have AESO unit ids and there are news articles that can be cited which state they have both been energized. Druidat (talk) 17:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks Druidat. ERV7, 8, and 9 are also online to the AESO doesn't really show much info on them. Dispatcho does, though. Enfinite has press releases on them, too. Braillegrenade (talk) 00:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Renewable Generating Station Status
[edit]The fossil fuel section of the list has 5 status colours, one of which "Facilities partially operational". This status difficult to define for renewable units due to the highly variable nature of their power production. I'd suggest that it not be applied to renewable facilities and that they achieve fully operational status based on citations.
To avoid confusion with the Fossil fuels section, the Renewable section should clearly indicate which statuses apply. Druidat (talk) 17:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yup, essentially all the claims that wind / solar plants are "partially operational" are done without any citation supporting that. The fact is, these plants almost never achieve their nominal power output, so for all intents and purposes they are always partially operational. Pkirvan (talk) 17:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Planned vs. Under Construction
[edit]It is extremely hard to verify which projects have actually started construction. For example, Peace River Energy Project is definitely not under construction, it's not even fully financed yet, but is listed as under construction. There is no public source for its status. Similarly, I can find no source showing that Winnifred Wind Project or Wild Rose 2 have actually broken ground.
I suggest that we instead just have one category called "proposed" instead of the two categories we have now. Pkirvan (talk) 17:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)