Talk:List of fictional princes
Appearance
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposal to keep list relevant
[edit]Only fictional princes with their own Wikipedia articles should be included in this list. Thoughts? Wes sideman (talk) 17:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- As no one has raised any objections to this in 3 weeks, I'll go ahead and start trimming. Wes sideman (talk) 14:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- I immediately suggest we should undo the trimming. Any of the characters should NOT be trimmed out of the list. Reese3196 (talk) 17:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- This isn't a place where you can just declare you don't like something and revert. You need to base opinions like this on Wikipedia policy. According to WP:NOT, we should avoid indiscriminate lists like this. Attaching a qualifier to keep the list relevant is the best way to do this. Wes sideman (talk) 15:41, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Shall I restore few of the prince characters that have been trimmed? Reese3196 (talk) 15:41, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- No, absolutely not. Most of the list is still a violation of WP:NOT. Wes sideman (talk) 15:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Shall I restore few of the prince characters that have been trimmed? Reese3196 (talk) 15:41, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- This isn't a place where you can just declare you don't like something and revert. You need to base opinions like this on Wikipedia policy. According to WP:NOT, we should avoid indiscriminate lists like this. Attaching a qualifier to keep the list relevant is the best way to do this. Wes sideman (talk) 15:41, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- I immediately suggest we should undo the trimming. Any of the characters should NOT be trimmed out of the list. Reese3196 (talk) 17:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Apologies for replying to something written five months ago, but while I do think the list should be limited, I would also say limiting it only to fictional princes with their own Wikipedia pages would be too much. Some works of fiction are, though still pop-culturally or otherwise notable, too short in length or do not have enough literary analysis done of them for individual characters to have their own Wikipedia pages.
I would say that a better, less strict benchmark would be fictional princes who 1) are from works of fiction with their own Wikipedia articles (or at least included in a collection, e.g. Arabian Nights), and who 2) are also major characters within said works (so no one-off side characters). That would mean the list would stay relevant while also not being too short. 95m95 (talk) 01:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)- If it's a "major character", the character would have their own article. I don't know of any other metric that you could evenly apply to determine "major". Wes sideman (talk) 10:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- List-Class fictional character articles
- WikiProject Fictional characters articles
- List-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles
- List-Class Men's Issues articles
- Low-importance Men's Issues articles
- WikiProject Men's Issues articles
- List-Class children and young adult literature articles
- Mid-importance children and young adult literature articles