Talk:List of crossings of the Cuyahoga River

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

Bridges and Tunnels Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor on 21 June 2017.

Can't go further

According to the last coord listed at U.S. Geological Survey Geographic Names Information System: Cuyahoga River, this is as far as the river goes. If it goes farther, I can't trace it based on the imagery at Google Maps. Yahoo is useful to a point, but without both of them, I can't trust what I'm seeing. And the Google Maps data at that area is clearly very old and low rez. - Denimadept (talk) 04:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: 102 crossings of one sort or another to date. - Denimadept (talk) 05:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Entries

VerruckteDan, what's your position on the non-bridge entries I've placed in List of crossings of the Cuyahoga River? I included them because they seemed relevant to me at the time, mainly to illustrate just how BUSY that river is. - Denimadept (talk) 22:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would lean towards removing entries that are not bridges, tunnels or dams. Things like power lines, and sewer pipes are not notable and I don't think they really add to the article. VerruckteDan (talk) 00:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added (RM) River Miles (need to merge more River Miles information from tables in the Cuyahoga River article and references); National Bridge ID # (for the federal/state-funded highway/road bridges); and updated: crossings, carries, location, and built with some additional information. I broke apart the divided interstate highway bridges which are really separate independent structures (I-480, I-271, I-80) with distinct National Bridge IDs for each span, but I do not know which ID goes with which span. There are a few Bridge IDs which I was not able to locate. I have some more information on which railroad lines are associated with which bridges, but it is going to take some time to digest/update (I mostly can do it as/when I go through the current Class III short-line railroads in the Cuyahoga Valley). With regard to which line items to include, in my personal view, someone needs to look at the "consumers" of such a list. The point of such a list is either:

For the few people navigating (canoeing/kayaking) the waters (or hiking alongside them), to be aware of "navigational" landmarks and hazards to navigation (both overhead and possibly hidden under the water's surface.
For people trying to cross over the watershed, to be aware of alternative routes.
For emergency responders, environmental/highway/watershed planners, and researchers, a somewhat concise list of crossings for them to use as they see fit.

In addition to bridges, For the above uses: artificial dams are fairly significant; the (3) Ohio EPA references in the Cuyahoga River article have a pretty good list of the Cuyahoga River dams, referenced by their "River Mile". I will try to add them soon. Whether to include cables/lines and pipes depends on the eventual uses for such a list. I do not see an issue if someone wants to include them, and I can help identify what some of them are. LeheckaG (talk) 01:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Power lines, sewer pipes and water pipes are not likely to be notable and should not be included in this list. I have been working from List of crossings of the Schuylkill River to add articles on each bridge, dam, and tunnel, starting with those in Philadelphia, so I have learned a lot about how to obtain information about bridges. Some bridges are NRHP listed, and some have good information in books about various railroads. Some of the bridges have signs with historical information, or plates with information when the bridges were dedicated. My best wishes to Ohio editors with a river with many crossings, and very few entries in this list. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1] has 14 bridges shown for the Cuyahoga River, and there might be more on the bridgehunter.com site without the waterway being mentioned.--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:35, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ruin/closed/removed

I'd like to explain my latest edit. When I first created this article, I included listings named "ruin", as I saw them in Google Maps, but had no name for them. Y'all have mostly fixed that problem. However, a bridge which is a ruin has not formally been removed/demolished. Also, a bridge can be closed without having been removed, perhaps for refurbishment or pending removal. I just wanted to clarify. If possible, the removal/closing year should be added as well, such as (removed, 2014) for the Innerloop Bridge, if that's correct. I've changed the format a bit but I still have a dearth of data. I hope y'all can fix that. - Denimadept (talk) 21:38, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'd like to mention that I originally modeled this list on List of crossings of the Connecticut River. I've created or converted (List of crossings of the Danube) several such lists based on that. - Denimadept (talk) 21:42, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of crossings of the Cuyahoga River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]