Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Susan Sarandon

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Film: Awards

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.

Zero sources cited on "awards" pages about BLPs

"Awards" pages about WP:BLPs, each had zero sources, none cited, whatsoever.
I've removed the wholly unsourced info about WP:BLPs.
Please don't add back unsourced info unless properly cited to sources that conform to site policy, including WP:BLP, WP:RS, and WP:V.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 20:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The claim of White Palace from the London Film Critics Circle did not pan out so I removed it and kept the correct Thelma and Louise citation. Some of these are tougher to get, but this should be enough for now. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Found one mistake. Boston Society of Film Critics has 1988 Best Actress as Melanie Griffith for Working Girl.[1] Meaning Susan Sarandon did not win according to the official website. @Cirt: - Think there is more? ChrisGualtieri (talk) 07:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations are clear - some seem to be missing, but the article is better now. Takes some work and you were right we had a high-level error at that. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 07:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The "book source" added is dubious as far as satisfying reliability standards on Wikipedia. I don't think we should use that source. Clicking from here to here shows its publisher is "Hats Off Books", which is "a publisher of children's books". Not the best source for this info on a WP:BLP. — Cirt (talk) 17:13, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of awards and nominations received by Susan Sarandon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6HiBoVqoY?url=http://variety.com/2002/tv/news/daytime-emmy-noms-announced-1117863876/ to http://variety.com/2002/tv/news/daytime-emmy-noms-announced-1117863876/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]