Jump to content

Talk:List of ancient cities in Thrace and Dacia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Namespace collision between Dacian towns and insects and arachnoids named after them

[edit]

Someone (would be interesting to know who) named spiders and butterflies after Dacian towns and now we have a collision with Entomologists :-) Take a look here: Talk:Napoca#Napoca disambig for an amusing conversation. I believe these Dacian towns deserve the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC pages as they are obviously the primary topic. If you want to write an article about a certain town, and the name is used by a butterfly, please write the article in your user space or WikiProject Dacia drafts space. In other words, you can create User:YOU/Drobeta or Wikipedia:WikiProject_Dacia/Drafts/Drobeta. If they collide with with more topics, which seem more important, we need to use names like Zeugma (ancient city), Zeugma (Dacia) and so on. In this case there is already a Zeugma (city) which is ancient, so Zeugma (ancient city) is not a good idea. But Zeugma (city) will probably need to end up in Zeugma (Commagene) if we will create Zeugma (Dacia). We also need disambiguation pages.--Codrin.B (talk) 21:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is this? A proposal of demerger

[edit]

Is there any reliable source listing together the ancient cities in Thrace and Dacia? Does that reliable source list exclusively the ancient cities in those two faraway Roman provinces? What does actually Thrace and Dacia mean in the context of the list (Thrace (disambiguation), Dacia (disambiguation))? Borsoka (talk) 18:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The split tag has been here for 4 months with no reply. Furthermore, there is insufficient information to carry out the tag (in the sense that it is not clear which cities belong to Thrace and which belong to Dacia). I think it is fair to say the discussion is dead and the tag can be removed. Op47 (talk) 19:54, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is this?

[edit]

What is the geographical scope of the article: the Roman provinces or something else? If the Roman provinces is the scope of the article, why are other territories included? Is there a reliable source which substantiates the union of the two distant Roman provinces? Borsoka (talk) 06:52, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that the limits of ancient regions will always be open to interpretation, I think the best solution would be to split the list along modern national lines (we already have List of ancient cities in Serbia). If desired, the ancient regions could be mentioned in those lists.Anonimu (talk) 20:20, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the above approach is logical. Borsoka (talk) 02:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Links removed from the Dacia article

[edit]

Here are two links removed from the Dacia article that I am adding to this talk page in case they might be useful:

There is a list of Dacian davas 1 and, more actual, at SOLTDM.

-Killian441 (talk) 18:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the cities by region?

[edit]

Where are cities in Thrace, Dacia, Paeonia, Mythological ones etc? Where are the cities by region. This must be fixed.MaryroseB54 (talk) 18:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of ancient cities in Thrace and Dacia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of ancient cities in Thrace and Dacia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_ancient_cities_in_Thrace_and_Dacia&oldid=1241713476"