Talk:List of acquisitions by Juniper Networks

List of acquisitions by Juniper Networks is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 11, 2009	Featured list candidate	Promoted

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing: Networking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Request edit

I have a COI/financial connection/affiliation with Juniper Networks. I'd like to request a couple minor edits to this page:

Can we add a couple acquisitions that are missing from the table? I've put them in the table's format below.

Acquisition date	Company	Business	Country	Value (USD)	References
December 2012	Contrail Systems, Santa Clara, CA. Founded: 2012	Software-defined network controllers	United States	US$176 million	^[1]
February 21, 2011	Brilliant Telecommunications, Campbell, CA Founded: 2004	Synchronization technology	United States	US$4.5 million	^[2]

I'd like to suggest using the date an acquisition was completed, as oppose to when it was announced, which would result in the following date changes:

Redline Networks: April 26, 2005 -> May 2, 2005[1]
Kagoor Networks: March 29, 2005 -> May 2, 2005[2]
Peribit Networks: April 26, 2005 -> July 6, 2005[3]
Blackwave Networks: October 28, 2010 -> November 8, 2010[4] (this one is a correction based on the source already used)

I could not find any publicly available sources about the Nexsi acquisition mentioned in paragraph 2; it's not included in their press release archives or annual report and there are no media reports or other sources on it. I asked Juniper (Original Research) and they verified the company acquired intellectual property from Nexsi through a bankruptcy proceeding, but it was not announced publicly and there is no available published information on it. So we have the age-old question of whether to maintain original research that happens to be correct.

CorporateM (Talk) 16:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. [Added two acquisitions due to sources given. I've not changed the dates as all four sources you have given are from the company itself and so I'll search for more reliable third-party sources per Wikipedia:Verifiability. However there are no exceptional claims being made and if I fail at finding any others I will return and make the changes you desire, they seem reasonable. For the third point, it seems fair to leave it in unless consensus demands otherwise. SamWilson989 (talk) 23:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)][reply]

Thanks user:SamWilson989! I'm not sure if it was on purpose, but you created a second Request Edit template with the parameters filled out, rather than filling out the parameters in the original one, which would leave the Request Edit as open/un-answered in the queue. I went ahead and removed the original. CorporateM (Talk) 23:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The second Request Edit template is automatic as I responded with a partial answer template, rather than a full answer template. It's usually done that way so that others can complete the rest of a partial edit. Don't worry though, it doesn't really matter in this case. SamWilson989 (talk) 23:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the dates to the acquisitions dates for you, and used the Juniper Network sources. They've been used already and are accurate. SamWilson989 (talk) 00:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks. Yes, usually when we have a comprehensive acquisition list like this, primary sources are acceptable, since there are no NPOV or weight issues and most companies reliably report on acquisition dates and volumes. It's always a bit of a curveball however when we have information that happens to be true, but for which no sources exist. Thanks for chiming in! Sometimes it takes months to get a reply on a request edit without bugging someone, so it was surprising to see such a prompt response. CorporateM (Talk) 00:36, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I just saw the request pop up as I was looking on the list and it seemed simple enough. Feel free to message me on my talk page again if you have any requests for this page that you cannot edit yourself. SamWilson989 (talk) 00:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Duffy, Jim (December 12, 2012). "Juniper buys SDN startup for $176M". Network World. Retrieved December 22, 2014.
^ Donegan, Michelle (February 21, 2011). "Juniper Outbids Rival in M&A Swoop". Light Reading. Retrieved December 24, 2014.

Lead

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Suggest replacing the second paragraph of the Lead, which relies heavily on primary sources, with the summary located at Juniper_Networks#Acquisitions_and_investments, which relies on secondary sources and would be more in-line with WP:Summary style. CorporateM (Talk) 20:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry no one responded to the request. It looks a good replacement to me so I've done the edit. 09:00, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks @Dmcq:! I trimmed the original research, primary sources, excess detail, etc. in the Lead that I intended for the well-sourced summary to replace. If that doesn't look ok, please let me know and I'll revert myself pronto! CorporateM (Talk) 15:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fine, the main article gives that sort of detail. Dmcq (talk) 00:18, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of acquisitions by Juniper Networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609133001/http://www.cedmagazine.com/cmts-combo-juniper-to-buy-pacific.aspx to http://www.cedmagazine.com/cmts-combo-juniper-to-buy-pacific.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of acquisitions by Juniper Networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120731030759/http://www.crn.com/networking/159907807 to http://www.crn.com/networking/159907807

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Duffy, Jim (December 12, 2012). "Juniper buys SDN startup for $176M". Network World. Retrieved December 22, 2014.

[2] Donegan, Michelle (February 21, 2011). "Juniper Outbids Rival in M&A Swoop". Light Reading. Retrieved December 24, 2014.

[1]

[2]