The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that despite Spider-Man 2 being the most critically praised entry in the franchise, it is also the lowest grossing in the trilogy?
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
The Raimi trilogy has its own article now, so it makes sense for this to be a subarticle specifically of the Raimi trilogy article. The Amazing Spider-Man can have its own accolades list. Neelix (talk) 20:44, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support: List of accolades received by the Spider-Man (2002) film series does seem like the right name to use, since there are multiple Spiderman film series, but this one only covers the series from the early 2000s. JenniBee (talk) 16:08, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Prefer List of accolades received by the 2002–2007 Spider-Man film series. No need for parens, and think a date range would be much clearer as to what this encompasses - the interesting part isn't the start date, it's the end date if the goal is to make clear that The Amazing Spiderman and forward aren't included. SnowFire (talk) 16:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
SnowFire's version works, for now. However, this is an artificial topic. The long-term solution is the merge each "accolade" item to the film article to which it pertains, as part of the "Reception" section. This is rather like having an article on "List of awards won by cast members of George Lucas films", or whatever. It's just not what we do. — SMcCandlish☏¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 02:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.