Talk:List of accolades received by Mad Max: Fury Road

List of accolades received by Mad Max: Fury Road is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 29, 2016	Featured list candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 27, 2016.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Mad Max: Fury Road won awards for its editing, costume design, and production design at the Academy Awards, and BAFTAs?

Film: Awards

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Awards

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

2010s Low‑importance

	2010s portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Should film accolades table entries where the film itself is the nominee have blank entries or repeat the film's titles?

@Cyphoidbomb, Krimuk90, and FrB.TG: Recently a number of film accolade articles have had the film titles removed from the table by IreneTandry when the film itself was the nominee [[1]], [[2]], [[3]]. This was because it was thought to be wasteful and that it follows convention [[4]]. [[5]]. I think that we should have the film title in the table so that the reader knows the film was nominated/won in that category rather than leaving it blank. I would be interested in thoughts of other people and am happy either way as long there is consensus. Cowlibob (talk) 15:50, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Right! Besides, it looks really weird to leave it blank. FrB.TG (talk) 16:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it might be wise to run this question past WikiProject Film to get more input and to see if there's a community consensus. I don't know how weird it looks. Doesn't it seem redundant to include the film's name if we already know that the film is the subject of the article? If you see "Best Film", do you wonder what movie we're talking about? Some of the featured list articles seem to include the title like List of accolades received by Brokeback Mountain and List of accolades received by Dallas Buyers Club and List of accolades received by Mary Kom (film). Don't know if this represents consensus, or common practice, or if it's a coincidence. I don't have a strong feeling about this either way, though. The overlinking, however, irks me... Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You see, Best Film does not necessarily go to the film itself. Certain awards name the film as the recipient of the award while there are a few that award the producers e.g. we can see so in the List of accolades received by Brokeback Mountain; there the nominee for the Best Picture Oscars is not the film but the producers. As far as redundancy is concerned, I think we already know the name of director, actors, and others too (since they are introduced in the lead), right? As for the overlinking part, it does not apply to sortable tables. Cheers, FrB.TG (talk) 18:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not too fussed either way, but it doesn't hurt to explicitly include the film's title if there wasn't an actual recipient. One thing to bear in mind is that it is theoretically possible for two films to share a win, so explicitly listing the winning film(s) will make it clear if the film is a solo or joint winner. Betty Logan (talk) 14:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of accolades received by Mad Max: Fury Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160201132028/http://aacta.org/the-awards/aacta-international-awards/nominees.aspx to http://www.aacta.org/the-awards/aacta-international-awards/nominees.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]