I oppose the idea of merging all the pages on Uppsala nations, as I think it would be a better idea expanding the pages themselves. I am currently working on improving the homogenicity of their layout. - Me 2010-09-10 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.243.227.253 (talk) 14:28, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Agreed. They're several hundred years old organizations with a lot of members. They have their own relevance. There's a much better chance that someone will expaned the articles if they're left as they are, than if they're merged into a long list. /Julle (talk) 16:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
They are notable enough to deserve their own articles. Maybe it's time to remove the merge templates from the articles now? --Skizziktalk21:11, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Agreed, no one seems to be interested in explaining why it would be a good idea to merge them. I've removed the templates. /Julle (talk) 13:05, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
