Talk:List of SIP software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Networking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Removed Gizmo

I have removed Gizmo Project from the list of SIP clients since it only allows to connect to the Gizmo Project network. I feel this makes it useless for anyone that will look at this page. I'm not sure if Jajah should be removed for the same reason (never used it). --Chealer 05:03, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will be useful undestend if the software can be used on OSX Linux or Windows Is a big mess. --matteo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 0.0.0.0 (talk • contribs)

The Gizmo Project uses the SipPhone network and can be used to call partner members that have agreed to open sip networking. Just because it only connects to one network initially, does not mean it is not a client. In fact it can connect to a second sip server. --65.102.114.180 00:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Comparison_of_VoIP_software

Why not merge this whole list with the Comparison? --Hm2k 01:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because this list is more extensive? SIP is not VoIP (cf. RFC 2327 and RFC 3261). Jniemi 15:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'll find that SIP is a VoIP protocol. --Hm2k 04:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SIP is not VoIP protocol. You can send over session any data: IM, Video, Files - there is no limits in SIP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sipexpert (talk • contribs) 17:30, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linkfarm

I started changing external links to internal, per WP:NOT#LINK. I'd appreciate help both with the link conversions and checking the internal links. Thanks. --Ronz 17:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll help by doing one section at a time so we do not overlap. Calltech 19:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consolidation or Removal

This list is becoming nothing more than a collection of non-notable orgs. (with only a few exceptions). Its been tagged as SPAM for months now. Lots of SPA's simply adding their company or products. I nominated it for Speedy Delete, but that was removed. Recommend paring it down similar to List of commercial voice over IP network providers, where only orgs with WP articles remain. Comments? Calltech 13:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The list is definitively no "collection of non-notable orgs". But, do we really need both, the Comparison of VoIP software and this, beeing a subset of the other?? It is correct, SIP is not only a VoIP protocol, but we could rename "Comparison of VoIP software"

--Kgfleischmann 13:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that 80% of the orgs listed here do not have WP articles and would most likely fail to pass WP guidelines, by WP:ORG definition they are not notable. And it appears to be simply a collecting area for users to add their own projects or orgs. I do agree that a merge of articles makes sense, with a purge of many of these non-notables. Calltech 14:45, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most of these projects are major notable projects. The only reason they do not have wikipedia articles is because Calltech has carefully deleted them all one by one. This is just the final step of cleaning wikipedia of all mention of Asterisk competitors. Someone, please stop him! Carewolf (talk) 10:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Organization

I fail to see the difference between SIP "Communication products", and "SIP servers". It seems like the two sections can be merged, and I should think that "SIP servers" is a better name between the two. -Verdatum (talk) 15:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mobicents

I need to ask the editors of this article to review and acknowledge the different Mobicents/Red Hat products as separate SIP servers, because they are very different independent projects with (mostly) different developers and target markets. It is confusing at first, but if you take a deeper look at the technology it will make sense. First, Mobicents is just a bundle of many different telco servers (SIP, Media and others) than can work independently of each other and have standalone releases. Now, Mobicents JAIN SLEE with SIP Resource adapter is a SIP server that can execute JAIN SLEE applications. Mobicents Sip Servlets is another SIP server that can execute Sip Servlet applications (which is very very different from JAIN SLEE SIP applications, the only common thing is that it's that they are both Java). Mobicents Sip Servlets alone is the counterpart of Sailfin from JBoss. Sip Servlets and JSLEE server do NOT share any entry-points when deployed together. Further, JBoss Communications Platform is the name of the a Red Hat-branded product, which is based on the Mobicents Platform bundle, but it's built on top of the Mobicents platform by adding features and services, which again from user POV is very different (and paid, even though it's still open-source).

Write an own article for each server has and we can do it! --Kgfleischmann (talk) 04:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skype for SIP

It's to be added Skype for Sip, maybe http://www.skype.com/business/products/pbx-systems/sip/ I don't add it because it's better before to understand well how it works. And I don't know enough about Sip --SkZ (talk) 21:36, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be some kind of gateway software. Before adding it, we should have more information, independent reviews ans so on. --Kgfleischmann (talk) 22:47, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blink

Bink is GPL, this is why it is free and opensource. NOT "non-free and opensource".81.173.171.230 (talk) 10:50, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

The article is marked with {{refimprove}}. What sort of improvements are we looking for? It seems that most of the burden of referencing should be on the linked articles. ~KvnG 23:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

other SIP software for the list

My "likely" (?) conflict of interest prevents me from adding the following SIP software to this list (Note i have no conflict of interest related to SIP software):

MizuDroid SIP VOIP Softphone. Free softphones for non-commercial usage and softphones for a fee with extra features.
Zoiper IAX SIP VOIP Softphone. IAX and SIP softphone application for voip calls.

Elmwoodie (talk) 20:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a list of of software with Wikipedia articles, we don't place external links here. - MrOllie (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]