Talk:List of Pokémon (221–251)

Tyrogue Problem

Tyrogue can evolve to any of 3 Pokemon. How can we get the infobox template to recognize that? Also, we're going to have the same problem with Gloom (Pokémon) when we get to it. -WarthogDemon 00:07, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

IMO, the Evolves To cell of the template should be modified so that it does not auto-link to whatever is put inside it; that cell should just be manually handled by page creators. That way, Gloom's Evolves To cell would have the code [[Vileplume]] / [[Bellossom]], typed out like that. Erik Jensen ^{(Appreciate|Laugh At)} 18:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

You know how to do that? I'm not good at making/adjusting templates. My experience ends with copy/paste. -WarthogDemon 20:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Can the names of the pokemon tyrouge evolves into not be separated by commas, with each of them linked seperately? -XxKibaxX Talk 20:19, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

As far as I can tell, no. That just creates: [[Pokemon 1 Pokemon 2]]. -WarthogDemon 20:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... I'll try it. -WarthogDemon 20:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

It sorta worked . . . but it looks odd. -WarthogDemon 20:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

It's not really that odd anymore. I'm almost positive that those tables are just that, tables, not templates. -XxKibaxX Talk 15:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Another Tyrogue Problem

Basic Pokémon are Pokémon that, when introduced, have no Evolved forms or Pre-Evolved forms. Baby Pokémon are Pokémon that, when introduced, have an Evolved form. They can't have Pre-Evolved Forms. So what do you call Tyrogue and Hitmontop? PMDFan (talk) 19:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

They are like Budew and Roserade in the 4th gen, kind of. Tyrogue was an interesting addition as a Baby Pokemon to evolve into the powerful Basic Pokemon of 'Lee and 'Chan. 'Top was added at the same time as Tyrogue, to be a third possibility of evolution, the harder one to get. When you got the Tyrogue in GSC, you thought "When its defense is higher, it's a Hitmonchan, if attack is higher, it's a Hitmonlee. What happens if they're the same???". Bottom line: 'Top is a Basic Pokemon, like the other two Hitmons, and Tyrogue is the Baby form of all 3. Hopefully this monologue helps. From the resourceful libraries of 2D Backfire Master (talk) 11:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Just a Thought

Why don't any of the Pokemon mini-articles ever mention if they are obtainable in Colosseum or XD? You don't need that much detail about it, just to mention their presence as a Snaggable Shadow. 2D Backfire Master (talk) 12:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Um... woah. Like déjà vu and stuff..... Totally radical man! -sesuPRIME ^{talk • contribs} 13:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry if I put the same thing in two different discussion pages, but being that the two Orre games are my all-time favorites, I feel that they deserve some recognition outside of their game page. Their articles are both short and kind of messy. I think I'm doing a good deed (or perhaps just spamming the message), but we should at least just make it kind of notable. After all, before FR-LG, Colosseum was the only source for the Johto Pokemon. From Solox a.k.a. Xavier a.k.a. 2D Backfire Master (talk) 11:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

So, Mudkip doesn't exist at all even in-universe?!

I thought Mudkip was supposed to have a section on this article! Just because Mudkip has a meme doesn't mean they don't exist even in-universe! True, keeping Mudkip out of existence is one way to avoid mudkipz debates, but you guys are treating Mudkips like they aren't in anything at all! >:(

TheGreenMartian (talk) (contribs)

19:25, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Some time ago, the number of Pokemon included in each list was changed; as a result, the Mudkip section went to the article titled List of Pokémon (252–280). This means that the talk page notice regarding Mudkipz needs to be moved to the proper location; I'll go ahead and take care of that shortly. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 01:10, 9 July 2010 (UTC)