Talk:List of Pair of Kings episodes

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. In addition, they should only briefly summarize the plot; detailed plot descriptions may constitute a derivative work. See Wikipedia's Copyright FAQ.

Vandalism

Article needs quite the cleaning. Limited knowledge on what all should be here and what shouldn't. Calabe1992 (talk) 23:53, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let the Clip Show

Less than an hour ago Disney XD showed a rerun of Pair of Kings and it was a clip show episode called "Let the Chip Show". It's not listed on the wiki. My FiOS TV Guide says it aired June 16, 2012, but it's not 100% reliable. Jon23812 (talk) 02:56, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Episode renumbering

The first episode of this series was aired as a single episode with one set of credits. The first airing of "Long Live The Kings Part 1 & 2" is cited as a single episode with the title including "Part 1 & 2". Despite this, User:Chascharl split both episodes and renumbered all episodes, and added "(Part 1)" and "(Part 2)" into some episode titles (despite not actually being part of the episode titles), using the misleading edit summary "Undid revision 536803992 by AussieLegend (talk) Geno Segers was absent for five episodes not four".[1] As well as the changes mentioned, it wasn't an undo at all - it was a major change to the article. I reverted and explained the issues on his talk page, and even invited him to discuss it here,[2] but his response was just to revert.[3] I've again asked him to discuss the matter,[4] to no avail, as he's just reverted again,[5] without any attempt to discuss. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

3 out of 4 general references list it as two episodes. user HH (contact | edits) 10:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Pair of Kings episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101027082559/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/25/friday-cable-ratings-sanctuary-down-yankeesrangers-suite-life-on-deck-pair-of-kings-big-time-rush-much-more/69588 to http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/25/friday-cable-ratings-sanctuary-down-yankeesrangers-suite-life-on-deck-pair-of-kings-big-time-rush-much-more/69588

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant trivia

76.28.10.189 continues to add this questionable material, to which I object for the following reasons:

Song titles are supposed to be enclosed within quotation marks.
One of the episodes is titled The Young and the Restless after the soap opera of the same name. Mentioning the soap opera's sister show, The Bold and the Beautiful, is irrelevant to Pair of Kings.
This sentence makes no sense to me: The funniest clips are The Planet's Funniest Animals, Funniest Pets & People, America's Funniest Videos, TruTV Top Funniest, and YouTube Funniest Videos. This appears to be the user's personal opinions of what he believes to be the funniest TV shows that use clips. This information is irrelevant to the Pair of Kings episode ("Let the Clips Show") except for the fact that it contains clips from previous episodes of the show.
Another episode is titled Dancing With the Scars, after the TV show Dancing with the Stars. Mentioning the name of the U.K. version of Dancing with the Stars is trivia and irrelevant to Pair of Kings as the episode is not named after the U.K. version.

Unless there is a good reason to keep this, I believe that it should be removed. AJFU (talk) 18:08, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As there have been no objections, I have reverted the user's changes. In addition to the above, it may be relevant to note that in recent days, the user has repeatedly removed italics from the page and then restored them, only to undo his own changes and remove the italics again, even though they are supposed to be there. I'm kinda starting to think that maybe he isn't really here to contribute constructively to The Wikipedia. AJFU (talk) 04:51, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Pair of Kings episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130122002217/http://www.disneyxdmedianet.com/assets/pr%5Chtml/pr50940.html to http://www.disneyxdmedianet.com/assets/pr%5Chtml/pr50940.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]