Talk:List of Kirby Buckets episodes

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disney Mid‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Ratings for episode "Mac's Back"

Since TV Media Insights restructured their site and old links are dead, those references need to be archived. The problem is, for "Mac's Back", there is a note saying it's in the comments section. Archive.org was not able to archive that since it uses Disqus which loads using JavaScript. I checked Archive.is (which we wouldn't be able to use anyway, thanks to some people, which I still find ridiculous). It has the comments section but no mention of Kirby Buckets, because it was archived too early. So we have no reliable way of verifying that information now unless we can find another source. That doesn't necessarily mean we have to remove it completely, I guess it can be assumed that it has been verified by the editor who added it at the time. nyuszika7h (talk) 15:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For "Kick the Buckets", I found it on Archive.is, but as I said it cannot be used on enwiki (see Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC), and I haven't yet found a way to get another site to archive it (I tried WebCite, but the resulting link is a 404). This is not the place to discuss it and it seems pointless to start another discussion as it probably wouldn't change the status quo, but this is a great example of how the people who have voted to ban its use are actively harming the encyclopedia. nyuszika7h (talk) 15:11, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I guess we can use Memento [1] as suggested at Wikipedia:Using archive.is. – nyuszika7h (talk) 15:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of Kirby Buckets episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articles/showbuzzdailys-top-100-wednesday-cable-originals-network-update-10-21-2015.html Archived 2019-05-19 at the Wayback Machine
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articles/showbuzzdailys-top-100-wednesday-cable-originals-network-update-10-28-2015.html Archived 2019-05-20 at the Wayback Machine
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articles/showbuzzdailys-top-100-wednesday-cable-originals-network-update-11-4-2015.html Archived 2019-05-20 at the Wayback Machine
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articles/expanded-showbuzzdailys-top-150-wednesday-cable-originals-network-update-11-18-2015.html Archived 2015-11-30 at the Wayback Machine
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articles/showbuzzdailys-top-150-wednesday-cable-originals-network-update-11-25-2015.html Archived 2015-11-30 at the Wayback Machine

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Viewership data

IJBall, Geraldo Perez, MPFitz1968, Nyuszika7H

Due to the nature of the viewership data being so hard to obtain and keep—the viewers link to the comment I just added for S2 E21 I'm sure will become invalid soon—especially season two, I'm considering just removing the viewers column altogether from the article. It would be nice if Showbuzz Daily would show everything, or, at the very least, up it to the top 200 or 250. If one of the other reliable sources, such as Zap2it's TV by the Numbers section, is more reliable for shows that have generally lower viewers, we could use one of them.

I'm open to ideas. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For season #2, I'd still leave it in – it looks like there's enough data there to populate about half of the (viewership) cells. However, at the main Kirby Buckets article, there is not enough data from these to do "season average viewership" values – luckily, it looks like nobody has really attempted that there. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With archive.is now removed from the blacklist, I should be able to get the info / fix the reference for some of them, though others are simply not available as on some days Showbuzz Daily seems to simply decide not to publish the full top 50/100/150/etc. (or even if they do it may fall outside that range). nyuszika7h (talk) 07:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it looks like I haven't even fixed the TV Media Insights links here yet... nyuszika7h (talk) 07:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated addition of number of episodes and end date for season two

It's pretty clear season two is over; however, we cannot put an end date or the number of episodes for that season until season three episodes are announced as that is WP:OR. If there is a source claiming the end of season two and its number of episodes, we can use that; however, no such source exists, so wait until season three episodes are announced. Any continued additions in the future will be reverted on the spot without hesitation. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]