Talk:List of Hollyoaks characters introduced in 2012

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hollyoaks task force.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

On 15 August 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved. The result of the discussion was move.

Sources

Good bit of reception for Phoebe - JuneGloom Talk

~~My First Tooth role~~Rain the 1 15:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Martha's a rubbish mum -~~ JuneGloom Talk 15:51, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Kelly John Morley Cerenko - This weeks guests~~Rain the 1 16:03, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reception for Ally - JuneGloom Talk 20:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reception for Doctor Browning - JuneGloom Talk 22:47, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan?

Hi, just wondering why Ryan from Comapny Magazine isn't on here? --MSalmon (talk) 17:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason - just everyone's busy.Rain the 1 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jen's surname

Have edited all references to "Gilmore" to the correct spelling of "Gilmour" - as seen on Tilly's flight booking: http://i46.tinypic.com/34y4i87.jpg 195.188.180.1 (talk) 08:53, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

She been credited as "Gilmore" in magazines, TV listings websites, the official website states "Gilmore" for both Jen and Liam. Numerous other sources also refer to the character as "Gilmore". I'd suggest that whoever created that prop didn't do their homework.Rain the 1 22:54, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Ed Morrison to others?

Should Ed be moved to others as he is not been seen since July and has not appeared for very long. If he does stay then maybe Connie & Herb Carter should be moved as they were in as long as Ed and has as much storyline info. EastStreet Lover, Soap Researcher :-) (talk) 15:40, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ed has development info, so he shouldn't be moved to Others. If development info can be found for Herb and Connie then they can be moved out of the table. A character's duration doesn't determine if they can be moved, some one/two episode characters have their own sections because they made an impact. Take Gethin Williams for instance. - JuneGloom Talk 23:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Shaw

dylan has been given a last name, its on the offical hollyoaks website — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.251.127.18 (talk) 22:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan is listed as "Departed", yet accordiing to Hollyoaks sources (10 May 2013) his character has not departed, and will be very much involved in the new Kane family plot lines with the (recast) Lacey Kane.

Jim McGinn

Surely Jim is a Barrister not a solicitor he defended both murder and perverting the course of justice both crown court offences (QueenAlexandria) 22:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC) (talk) 22:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Over the long time that this series has been running, you should have worked out that the producers don't have the first clue about the legal profession, about the difference detween barristers and solicitors, between Circuit Judges and High Court Judges, etc., They also haven't worked out that people with criminal records like Jack and Darren couldn't possibly hold personal licences - and the same applies to Ste. One doesn't watch "Hollyoaks" for realism, just for good entertainment!

Sienna Blake

Surely Sienna Blake should be given an actual page now? Her entry is way too long for being listed here? --Onlythetruthisappropriate (talk) 03:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]