User talk:Eaststreetlover

July 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of EastEnders characters (2011), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - JuneGloom Talk 18:07, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of EastEnders characters, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mayhem Mario 10:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to June 16. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do not add entries to articles which are not notable. See WP:NN. Srobak (talk) 13:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Fiz Brown, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RaintheOne ^BAM 14:36, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Leanne Battersby. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. RaintheOne ^BAM 14:36, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soap Opera Articles

Hello Eaststreetlover. I've recently noticed you are participating in a high volume of disruptive editing. Please do move pages because "that is her legal name" - As this is wikipedia and we edit fiction from the real world perspective - Wikipedia:COMMONNAME applies to these chaarcters. What they are most well known as in the real world, via media/sources/popculture is what we go off. Do not remove hidden message as they are in place for a reason and more than five editors have endorsed what they are saying. Please do not continue to make these serious disruptions and ask for help. I'm more than willing to offer advice and help when it comes to Soap articles.RaintheOne ^BAM 14:45, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you meant "do not move pages" ? Srobak (talk) 15:08, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Janine Malloy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GSorby – Ping! 18:00, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You will find I did not use vandalism on the page, Janine Malloy, I just edited one item - which was the date of ryan and janine's marraige! What is the problem with just changing that! Eaststreetlover 19:10 8 September 2011 (UTC)

If it is not accurate and is not sourced - there is a lot of problem with it. Srobak (talk) 18:12, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to put a ref on the date of darren's depature (his page). I'm not very good with them so please forgive me if I have done it wrong, Eaststreetlover 13:33 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rose Cotton (EastEnders). Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 06:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of Coronation Street characters, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RaintheOne ^BAM 18:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Aaron Livesy. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RaintheOne ^BAM 18:40, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to List of Hollyoaks characters. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rain the 1 17:47, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Hollyoaks characters, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rain the 1 14:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of Hollyoaks characters (2011), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Adding information without a source, which conflicts the source in place on the page in which the actor states the opposite of what you wrote Rain the 1 17:41, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page List of EastEnders characters appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. The source you added did not support your claim and you know too well what you are doing. Rain the 1 22:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Watts family. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - JuneGloom Talk 22:16, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to R&R (EastEnders). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GSorby – Ping 22:19, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've just noticed you have created John Barton (Emmerdale character) and Katy Armstrong (Coronation Street), despite redirects having already been created for the articles at the correct names. John's article has very few sources, while Katy's has none. You also blanked the list entries without an explanation. I've asked for an admin's help to sort out the mess. - JuneGloom Talk 16:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Okay, I'll see if I can help here. If you want to create an article for John, you have to have plenty of sources and real world information about casting, characterisation, important storylines, reception, etc. Then you need to create it at John Barton (Emmerdale), the correct name for the article. I wonder, did you check if a redirect already existed, before you created your article? The same thing goes for Katy. Her article needs to be created at Katy Armstrong, but only when you have plenty of sources. I think GSorby may have been working on an article for her, so you might want to ask if you can help or if it's ready. If you don't have any sources and real world info for the characters, have a look for some and maybe create a sandbox (User:Eaststreetlover/John Barton or User:Eaststreetlover/Katy Armstrong) where you can draft your articles. I often do mine offline. Once it's complete, you can ask an admin to move it for you. One quick note, please use edit summaries! They help other editors to see what you have done and why. - JuneGloom Talk 16:42, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrie/Emmerdale

Please stop creating new articles for characters that already have established links for their redirects. If you think a character needs an article instead of a redirect, type over the redirect instead of creating a brand new page. You are causing me a lot of work to merge these histories. Also, the characters are not notable, so I have to revert back to the redirect anyway. In other words, think about what you're doing before you do it. Think about if the character is notable. –anemone projectors– 16:28, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of Tracy Beaker Returns characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lisa Coleman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tracy beaker Reuturns

Please do not add the characters into the main article as there is a seperate article for this. and Liam O Donovan is appearing from episode 9 onwards - making him recurring not past. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr tompty (talk • contribs) 19:20, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Amber Kalirai, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [1] Rain the 1 17:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. When you recently edited Tracy Beaker Returns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lisa Coleman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Faye and Xin

Hey. I would create a draft in your userspace first, for example; User:Eaststreetlover/Xin or User:Eaststreetlover/Faye. You'll need to gather a lot of reliable sources for casting, development and reception sections (aka real world information). The guidelines at WP:SOAPS may be useful to you, particularly Notability standards. Out of the both of them, I think Xin may be more notable at the moment (though I haven't looked for sources myself). - JuneGloom Talk 17:02, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 in British television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wild at Heart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Eva Price.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Eva Price.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George^Ping! 15:49, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My drafts

Please stop my drafts and adding images to userspace articles. Plus the images you uploaded are improperly licensed Thank you. George^Ping! 15:50, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ANdrew.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ANdrew.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George^Ping! 15:51, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Max, Tanya & Derek.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Max, Tanya & Derek.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George^Ping! 15:51, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Lorraine Stevens.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lorraine Stevens.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 17:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Butcher Ricky.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Butcher Ricky.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:44, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to List of Hollyoaks characters does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! - JuneGloom Talk 18:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. When you recently edited Characters of Casualty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nick Jordan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Changes to my edits

I'm sorry, but rowspans in the table look horrible and will always need changing when more information becomes available, therefore they are a little pointless. You also removed sources in the Coronation Street table, which I added back. I will not stop editing something because you don't like it. Everyone's edits get changed and copy edited now and then, it's all part of the process. - JuneGloom Talk 14:58, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say sorry if the tone of my reply came across as too harsh. Unfortunately you caught me at a bad moment and I took it out on you. - JuneGloom Talk 15:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Preeya Kalidas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Partridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to an Admin

I have reported you to an admin. The year is now 2013 and for the past two years you have abused Wikipedia. You have been warned, talked to and helped. But you appear to care little for any effort provided by any editor on the project. I think waiting since 2011 for you to conform to some of Wikipedia's most basic is called incredibly supportive, understanding and assuming way too much good faith. It stops here.Rain the 1 01:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Joel Dexter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I am issuing a final warning because you have previously been given two only warnings and one final warnings, yet you have never been blocked but you have continued to add unsourced information to articles (hence the warnings). You have been editing since July 2011, and it is now January 2013, so you really should know by now how to add citations. –anemone projectors– 09:10, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for for adding unsourced information to articles, as you did at List of Hollyoaks characters. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. –anemone projectors– 12:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Hollyoaks locations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Enjoy the Ride and America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Liberty Savage, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Rain the 1 13:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Amy Barnes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kevin Foster

Carl Costello (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bryan Kirkwood

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion for you

Since you removed a reference from List of EastEnders characters, saying it doesn't need to be referenced, I've started a discussion at Talk:List of EastEnders characters#References. I'd like to know your thoughts. –anemone projectors– 15:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm Raintheone. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ste Hay, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rain the 1 19:10, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Kirsty-Leigh Porter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rain the 1 20:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 22:21, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rose Cotton (EastEnders) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rose Cotton (EastEnders), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock requests

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Eaststreetlover (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

178.78.114.180 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Eaststreetlover". The reason given for Eaststreetlover's block is: "Disruptive editing: adding original research despite n

Blocking administrator: 5 albert square (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eaststreetlover (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I am unaware of the evidence of the 'trolling, disruption or harassment' that I have allegedly done after a warning from Rain the 1 so I don't where I have done wrong afterwards for 5 albert square [[User ~~eaststreetlover~~ (talk) 10:47, 29 August 2013 (UTC)]][reply]

Decline reason:

Are you joking? There must be two dozen explicit warnings on this page and at least one block, and you want to quibble on "I didn't do it after warning 25"? I don't see unblocking without some very detailed explanation of why you've ignored every warning thus far, and what exactly it is that you're going to be doing differently. Kuru (talk) 01:24, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your article submission Rose Cotton (EastEnders)

Hello Eaststreetlover. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Rose Cotton (EastEnders).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rose Cotton (EastEnders)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:03, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Andrew Cotton, from its old location at User:Eaststreetlover/Andrew Cotton. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Andrew Cotton concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Andrew Cotton, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]