Talk:List of Grevillea cultivars

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal List of Grevillea cultivars is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Reinstated image

I've reinstated the superb image. I hope people don't mind. I did this because images all on one page is a really useful resource for trying to identify a plant from a sample. Once the page has more pictures I would even suggest converting the list into an image gallery (using the <gallery> tag). John Dalton 05:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK - given there is a lack of photos probably doesn't matter at the moment, but I have found that galleries seem to be discouraged on many pages and that it is better to link to Wikipedia commons. Currently given there is a big long list it does make the page look nice having images down the RHS. Cas Liber 05:39, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it could also be said that identification is potentially a job for wikispecies rather than wikipedia. Unfortunately wikispecies doesn't seem to have a path for identifying something. Maybe it is a gap for wikipedia to fill, even if it is a temporary measure? If you already know what it is you can get more information on it from wikispecies, but it doesn't seem to be good for answering the question "What plant is that?". I've sometimes thought a good application for a wiki would be for a bunch of knowledgeable people to write an expert system whereby you start at the main page of a wiki and each page contains a multiple choice question. Each answer links to another question page and so on until a page is reached which it its wikispecies entry. It might even be an application for a wiki version of the semantic web. Do any plant people here know whether such a thing already exists on the web? John Dalton 07:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are published books with professional keys in them for flora in various parts of Australia. Part of the Flora of Australia series may have a Key attached to it too. It is a good idea, not sure how it would go with intellectual property etc. Cas Liber 08:06, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's the beginnings of an interactive identification key at wikibooks. An example of a more layman-friendly approach for a limited flora can be seen here . Photographs certainly help.--Melburnian 12:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think this article would be better off entitled List of Grevillea cultivars? Hesperian 06:19, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was thinking the same--Melburnian 06:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it's unanimous. ;-) I was about to move it but I notice you're working on it right now. I don't want to EC you. Perhaps you can move it when next convenient? Hesperian 12:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

... on second thoughts I'll check that Cas is aware of this discussion. Hesperian 12:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed. We still need a backgrounder on Grevillea cultivars in general, though this can perhaps be incorporated in the main Grevillea article.--Melburnian 13:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah - happy to move it too. The preamble is not going to be very long anyway.cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Grevillea cultivars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927172121/http://asgap.org.au/ASGAP/grev57.pdf to http://asgap.org.au/ASGAP/grev57.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]