Talk:List of English cricketers to 1771
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of English cricketers to 1771 was copied or moved into List of English cricketers (1772–1786) with this edit on UTC 07:54; 2019-01-29. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
The contents of the Thomas Brandon (cricketer) page were merged into List of English cricketers to 1771 on 22 September 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
The contents of the Edmund Chapman page were merged into List of English cricketers to 1771 on 2019-01-18. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
The contents of the John Bell (Kent cricketer) page were merged into List of English cricketers to 1771 on 2019-01-18. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Illustrations
[edit]There are some excellent pictures, but the one with this caption has such a peripheral relationship to cricket that I think it would be better omitted: March of the Guards to Finchley. The 1745 Jacobite rebellion had little if any impact on London cricket in the days of "Long Robin" and single wicket. JH (talk page) 15:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- I just wanted to put something into a period that will otherwise make for a wide gap between images. I could do with a caricature of Colchin if only someone could do one. Do you think a change of caption would help or shall I take it out? I don't mind. BlackJack | talk page 20:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Personally I would take it out. I'm also dubious about the Queen Elizabeth one. You seem to have quite a reasonable number of illustrations, so I don't think that you need to "stretch" like that. (A possible substitute it, with greater relevance, might be a picture of the Royal Grammar School, Guildford. There's a suitable picture in the Wiki article. It would need to have quite a lengthy explanatory caption, of course, (or an explanation in the text) which is a slight snag.) JH (talk page) 20:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. The school photo is very apt. Thanks for that. I'm going to add it to the early history article too. A pity about Queen Elizabeth as she looks very attractive in that portrait! BlackJack | talk page 08:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Personally I would take it out. I'm also dubious about the Queen Elizabeth one. You seem to have quite a reasonable number of illustrations, so I don't think that you need to "stretch" like that. (A possible substitute it, with greater relevance, might be a picture of the Royal Grammar School, Guildford. There's a suitable picture in the Wiki article. It would need to have quite a lengthy explanatory caption, of course, (or an explanation in the text) which is a slight snag.) JH (talk page) 20:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
A question of dates
[edit]The year given for the John Derrick entry is 1597. It's true that that was the year in the Julian Calendar (Old Style or OS) in use at the time, but in the Gregorian Calendar (New Style or NS) we now use it fell in 1598. I would be inclined to use 1598, but if not then there should at least be an explanatory footnote (as is done in Derrick's own article). Fortunately the problem only arises with dates in the early months of the year (prior to the Quarter Day on 25th March, I think, which I believe was taken as New Year's Day), so shouldn't be a problem for most of the other pre-1752 entries, where the event referred will generally have taken place during the cricket season. JH (talk page) 19:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- I agree. Who are you? :-) ----Jack | talk page 19:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- Oops. Now signed. JH (talk page) 19:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of early English cricketers to 1786. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.jl.sl.btinternet.co.uk/stampsite/cricket/ladstolords/index.html#biogs
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
People who played cricket as opposed to cricketers
[edit]There seem to be quite a lot of entries, particularly in the first table of this, where the people involved aren't cricketers as such but people who are known to have played cricket. I'm thinking about those involved in various trials and so on mainly. I'd suggest going through and removing those who fall under the "people who played cricket" category, unless anyone objects massively. Thanks. Blue Square Thing (talk) 12:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'll think about actioning this as no one has objected. Not quite sure, but I imagine a summary section will be useful. Lots of the detail is covered elsewhere anyway. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Begun to do this. It might want changing or even reverting. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Splitting list
[edit]Having worked on the list from 1787 to 1825 and just about got that sorted - bar checking - I'm inclined to split this list and create a List of English cricketers 1772 to 1786. This will give us definite inclusion criteria as we can use first-class status. This list can stay until 1771 and there will be lots of cross-referencing, but it means that we can get an alphabetical list in the same style as for 1787- which is much easier to use. There will be plenty which can just be copied across anyway. Objections? Or better ideas? Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'm going to go ahead and do this boldly and we'll see what happens. It can always be undone if necessary. Blue Square Thing (talk) 07:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- This is done and has been gone through and verified. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Noting that this discussion exists, should anyone want to reconsider the splitting of the article. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
"Ridgeway (Sussex cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ridgeway (Sussex cricketer) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 13 § Ridgeway (Sussex cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
"Tom Peake" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Tom Peake and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 13 § Tom Peake until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
"John Bryant (cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect John Bryant (cricketer) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 13 § John Bryant (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
"James Bryant (Kent cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect James Bryant (Kent cricketer) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 13 § James Bryant (Kent cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
"John Cutbush (cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect John Cutbush (cricketer) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 13 § John Cutbush (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
"John Mills (Kent cricketer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect John Mills (Kent cricketer) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 14 § John Mills (Kent cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
"List of early English cricketers to 1786" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect List of early English cricketers to 1786 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 17 § List of early English cricketers to 1786 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)