Jump to content

Talk:List of British far-right groups (1945–present)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

.

[edit]

Is it really accurate that Martin Webster resigned from the League of Empire Loyalists aged 14 in 1957? According to the Martin Webster entry he was born in 1943.81.100.121.68 (talk) 16:10, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I grouped some AfD and minor far right/fascist party pages in it a bigger general page. I have done schools in the bouorghs of Sandwell and Dudley- Former secondary schools in the Metropolitan Borough of Dudley/Primary schools in Sandwell. I will go on to the UK’s far left and Slovakian railways.Wipsenade (talk) 16:04, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

100% compleated!Wipsenade (talk) 18:07, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

[edit]

I've de-merged the National Fellowship and Patriotic Party (UK) articles, as those weren't explicitly fascist groups. I'm unclear what the criteria or reasoning for merging in the remainder is - where was the discussion about this merge? Warofdreams talk 15:14, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many stem from Mosley's legsey or either John Tyndall, Andrew Fountain, Eddy Morrison, Colin Jordan and A.K. Chesterton's views over the last 40 years. Thank you for pointing out the precise nature of the National Fellowship and Patriotic Party (UK). Wipsenade (talk) 15:56, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

[edit]

I have corrected 6 spelling mistakes in paragraph 3, amd removed the word "dangerouse" (sic) from paragraph 4. Although I am sure the majority of WP readers would agree with the intended sentiment expressed by the word "dangerouse", its use surely violates WP's standards of neutrality and verifiable factuality. Wipsenade, I don't wish to appear offensive, but I really think you should run your contributions through a spell checker before posting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.117.52 (talk) 23:00, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Celtic and regionalist groups

[edit]

This section has nothing to do with the main article thread. While some of these groups are alledged to have leanings to fascism it would be nearer to truth to list just these few where documentation is available. IMO most groups are fiercely nationalist, but that doesn't equal fascist. I would like to remove this section and instead list only those groups with documented fascist leanings. I also oppose the term "celtic.JerseyCommie (talk) 00:10, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus sought

[edit]

The mergers were done without seeking consensus and so I have reversed most of them whilst expanding the relevant articles. As the main editor of most of the articles merged here I would certainly have liked to have been consulted before this unilateral change was made and I'm sure others who have contributed to these articles would also like to have been consulted. AfD is mentioned as a reason for the initial merger but any of these articles that have been nominated have survived so that is not a valid reason. Similarly describing them as minor as a reason is also problematic as it is opinion and all the groups are covered in multiple reliable sources. Similarly comparisons with articles about schools in Dudley or railway lines are not relevant as, in most cases, such articles can never be expanded beyond stubs but the vast majority of these now have. There is also the issue of confusion between fascism and far/extreme right but that is a side issue.

A master list of groups is a good idea but it can be done without merging everything into one, a move that makes the page difficult to navigate, hard to edit and indeed discourages editing as it suggests the stubs are enough. Instead a short description of every group with a link to the relevant article is a better idea, with the really minor groups that would otherwise fail notability issues included here and nowhere else. The article has now been changed to reflect these concerns although in many cases a bit more information could be added to the short descriptions without going too far into duplication territory.

Having spent some time overhauling the articles that were admittedly too short I decided to go ahead and make the changes outlined without discussion. WP:Be bold got us here so it might as well be used again. Keresaspa (talk) 01:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of British far-right groups since 1945. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Socialist Parties

[edit]

I was lead to believe that as a Socialist the views were left wing and not right. Therefore any Party claiming to be a Socialist Party eg: Hilter, Zedong and Stalin you stand to the left of moderation. Right wing ideologies tend to look after themselves unless affected by others as apposed to left wing thoughts of a more controlled system that does include everything. Whilst talking Hitler, he was a Fascist and also a socialist, you can't claim Fascism as a right wing movement. (Darmech (talk) 17:14, 8 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of British far-right groups since 1945. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_British_far-right_groups_(1945–present)&oldid=1216353862"