Talk:List of British Rail modern traction locomotive classes
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Withdrawal dates
[edit]References for these are needed for pretty much every class. If you know of one for even one class, please add it. Tompw (talk) 20:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
References - Overuse??
[edit]The use of references seems to be over-the-top and is beginning (at least through my eyes) to be intrusive and making the page complex to read. Can we not place the references in a "Notes" column?? Canterberry 10:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
We Could, You Can Edit. AlfreDziku (talk) 07:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:IC250 Cl93 2.jpg
[edit]The image Image:IC250 Cl93 2.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --18:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Images have been mixed up
[edit]The images in this article no longer match the appropriate loco classes. At some recent point, the images appear to have been mixed up. Is it possible to remove the offending changes and revert to an earlier version? If not, then the images need to be moved to match the appropriate classes and titles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.40.7 (talk) 11:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- Which ones do you believe to be incorrect? --Redrose64 (talk) 18:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
They all seem to be correct now. Thanks. Previously, the class 73 large jpeg was mixed up with the class 86 large image. However, as I can't see any edit history, I assume this must have been some technical glitch with rendering the page. Please therefore ignore my previous comment. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.156.31.241 (talk) 23:21, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of British Rail modern traction locomotive classes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160117080030/http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160117080030/http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160117080030/http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160117080030/http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- The archive links failed, because they were not far enough back in time. Now fixed – Iain Bell (talk) 13:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of British Rail modern traction locomotive classes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070217154606/http://www.therailwaycentre.com:80/index.html to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of British Rail modern traction locomotive classes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061218234321/http://homepages.tcp.co.uk/~pandy/cl26.html to http://homepages.tcp.co.uk/~pandy/cl26.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
No Locomotive
[edit]There Is No Class 82 DVT In The Article. AlfreDziku 2 (talk) 22:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- That's because they aren't locomotives. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- I think they are. They look like class 91/Intercity 225 Range AlfreDziku (talk) 07:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Just because you "think" they are doesn't mean that they really are. The term "locomotive" is from Latin words meaning "self-moving". These cannot move by themselves; therefore, they are not locomotives. What they look like is immaterial, the similar styling of these and Class 91 is probably because they were designed by the same team, with a deliberate effort to produce harmony. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- I think they are. They look like class 91/Intercity 225 Range AlfreDziku (talk) 07:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
The Wrong Amounts Of Scrapping,
[edit]On This List It Say eg. ‘127’ And ‘126’ Scrapped But, On The Wikipedia Page Like British Rail Class 45 It Says 127 Built, 11 Preserved/116 Scrapped AlfreDziku (talk) 06:59, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- First, provide reliable sources per the policy on verifiability. Second, don't capitalise every word. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Numbers
[edit]Some of the locomotives do have TOPS numbers but, they are not listed. AlfreDziku (talk) 07:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Please Reply to this discussion if you found one of these locomotives. AlfreDziku (talk) 07:14, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
One example is Class 14 All Of Them Only Had Pre-TOPS Number Except 14 901 AlfreDziku (talk) 07:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Pictures
[edit]Class D2/7 Has A High Resolution Picture Even Though All Are Scrapped The One In The Photo Isn’t Scrapped AlfreDziku (talk) 12:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- List-Class List articles
- Unknown-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles
- List-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- List-Class UK Railways articles
- Mid-importance UK Railways articles
- List-Class Scotland Transport articles
- Mid-importance Scotland Transport articles
- Locomotives task force articles
- Passenger trains task force articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- List-Class United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles