User talk:Railwayfan2005

Welcome!

Hello, Railwayfan2005, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! .

Also, if you are interested, why not join the UK Railways WikiProject? Simply south 23:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:SP 30.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:SP 30.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear.

Sorry I did not upload this file, It's on commons already, uploaded by User:Jot. I did run into some database outages last night - perhaps the history has been corrupted along the way.

SNCF Locos

Hi, do you plan to cover the Y2100 class? If you do, there is an interwiki link on the Chemin de Fer de la Baie de Somme article which will need to be changed. Mjroots (talk) 20:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We'll get there in the end but I've not got any thing to base an article on yet. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 20:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Hi! Why is here a box with grey color and others have brown? Thanks,--TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's the color defined in the {{Infobox Locomotive Auto}} template, I don't know why it's set different to the original {{Infobox Locomotive}} template though.Railwayfan2005 (talk) 20:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Sittingbourne and Kemsley Light Railway, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Olana North (talk) 09:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure where you got the information came from about Edward Lloyd being converted to Ivor the Engine, but their website does not verify your claim either. Olana North (talk) 09:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I visited the SKLR and observed it first hand. See [1] for a picture. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 11:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portishead Railway

I like the new diagram, but that coal terminal is it right? Do you have a reference for it, or have you created the diagram from what is written in the article?Pyrotec (talk) 18:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reference is <nowki>Jacobs (Ed.), Gerald (2005). Railway Track Diagrams Book 3: Western. Trackmaps, Bradford upon Avon. ISBN 0-9549866-1-X. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)</nowiki>. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 11:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. In that case it must be a newish addition added about the same time as the Royal Portbury Dock extension. I'd (mis)-assumed it was intended to represent the power station coal terminals at Portishead pier.Pyrotec (talk) 11:45, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's part of the Royal Dock, I've change the M5 to a proper motorway!Railwayfan2005 (talk) 11:48, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UIC notation

Hello Railwayfan, thank you for your recent edits to the Vossloh G1206 article. Just one note, could you try to avoid replacing fully encompassing UIC classification (eg. Bo'Bo') with less complete and simplified AAR wheel arrangement as this latter notation loses information and is also US-specific. Many Thanks once again, —Sladen (talk) 22:29, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you understand the meaning of the "o" in Bo-Bo and how this applies to diesel hydraulic locomotives? Railwayfan2005 (talk) 22:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not aware of any chains, or rods that connect the two axles mechanically together on the G1206 bogies, so that would point to four hydraulic motors—I'm certainly interested to hear, and would welcome any lesson, if the UIC methods should be applied differently with DH traction. —Sladen (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The method is applied consistently: DH traction has only got one transmission unit on each bogie so no "o" is warranted. The axles are effectively connected internally through the drive system. The presence of rods/chains makes the interconnection clearer on 0-4-0+0-4-0 type locos. If you want a reference see ^[1] which is quite clear about distinguishing B'B' locos from Bo'Bo' locos. The same issue exists with French monomotor freight locos: these are quite often misquoted as being Bo'Bo' or Co'Co' when they are actually B'B' or C'C'. There are lots of places, some quite reputable and should know better, which make the same mistake (eg the Angel trains website lists the Vossloh G1000 as a Bo'Bo', which I don't think this is correct.) Aside from all this, the UIC classification talks about electric traction motors - a DH has none of these so the "o" cannot possibly apply! Railwayfan2005 (talk) 23:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Railway stations of London - in colour"

Hi there! Just to let you know over the last year or so I have visited and photographed every single station (that's National Rail, Tube and DLR) within the six principal London Travelcard Zones (except Denmark Hill - which I intend to do some time this weekend!). I'm a bit 50-50 when it comes to considering Tramlink stops as "stations" per se, especially given that Tramlink is zoned and ticketed more like London Buses than the railway network proper. FWIW, so far I've done 12 tramstops with 27 remaining. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 01:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I was asked to read the discussion at User talk:Sfan00 IMG and User talk:Denelson83 and, if I agreed with the arguments presented, to revert the edits to the templates. I did, so I did. DS (talk) 20:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing this up. I hope the issues can be resolved.Railwayfan2005 (talk) 20:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SNCF loco template

I've removed the "commonscat" and "category:SNCF locomotives" link you added to Template:SNCF locomotives , and at the same time fixed the relevent articles..

The problems is - that it makes a commons link appear even if there are no pictures, also it messes up articles which have been categorised by redirects, and it messes up formatting of locomotives which have more than one 'navbox' ie locos that are used by more than one state.FengRail (talk) 03:55, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 16:26, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Railwayfan2005 (talk) 21:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reşiţa

Everyone, myself foremost, agrees instances of ş and ţ should be moved to ș and ț, and has done so for at least a year now. But of course, this should happen in toto and simultaneously, not piecemeal across the years. It would be rather silly to have Reșița while having Piteşti, Botoşani, Braşov and Piatra Neamţ, would it not? So by all means let's get the gears of a grand move going, but not do so in little bits until that happens. - Biruitorul ^Talk 23:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is a bot being prepared to do this? How about an info box on the talk page showing that the page is recognised as requiring the change and for other editors to sit back and wait for the bot to come along? If you need an info box I can see if I can put one together. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 23:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To my knowledge, no bot is being prepared, but that would be nice. The only major issue is with Ș/ș: Turkish uses ş (e.g. Eskişehir), so we'd have to be careful not to move Turkey-related pages. I know that on Romanian Wikipedia, they tagged Turkey pages to make the bot skip those; not sure how it would work here. Ț/ț, however, are good to go. - Biruitorul ^Talk 02:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this change too; I guess I could program a bot to do it, though if it's already been done on Romanian Wikipedia, someone might already have a bot ready and tested that could be put to work on en.wp - can we find out?--Kotniski (talk) 06:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a little template to be used on the talk page of an article: User:Railwayfan2005/Sandbox/Romanian S & T. It's a little rough and ready at the moment. This can be added by hand to point the bot at files to move. Next step would be to find a means of getting a page list for straight forward moves: All titles with T-Cedilla will catch a lot of things. Then it's down to some magic with S-Cedilla pages in Romanian categories. (I'm not skilled in either of these steps...) Searching for articles with S-Cedilla in the title gives 27,724 results-Definitely bot territory! Once the bot has moved the page over it should replace the move template with one explaining the difference between S/T-cedilla and S/T-comma. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 21:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of points: first, this discussion may be of interest. Second: it seems this was the script they used on ro.wiki. - Biruitorul ^Talk 23:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys. I'm the bot operator that made the change at ro.wp. Of course, I still have the code of the robot. However, as you can see from the first link provided by Biruitorul above, en.wp has its own problems (the most important of which is the roughly equal number of Romanian and Turkish titles containing "ş"). At ro.wp we used some templates and HTML tricks to mark the turkish words. It is probable that those will not be accepted here - but you can always start a discussion.

In my opinion, the best solution for en.wp seems to be renaming the articles and leaving the content to be converted manually by the users. As more and more will write with the correct symbols, the articles will slowly be converted. Of course, this means that in the process, you will have mixed articles (with both the old and new diacritics). The question is wether this is an acceptable compromise.

You can use ro:MediaWiki:diacritice.js any time in your own user scripts if you want to make sure you write with the correct diacritics (and that you convert the whole article in the process).--Strainu (talk) 07:31, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this is too optimistic, but I'd have thought that it would be quite simple to check whether an article containing "ş" is Romanian or Turkish (just look for certain strings in the wikitext - of course there will be some that mention both countries or neither, and they would have to be checked by hand). And once you have an article identified as Romanian (with no mention of Turkey/Turkish), then if we're going to change the title, I'd have thought we might as well do the substitutions in the text as well - there might be very occasional errors, but generally speaking it ought to be fairly smooth.--Kotniski (talk) 09:01, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article bodies can be updated by using AWB, or perhaps using Wikipedia:Lists of common misspellings. It's the actual articles which are the work to be done. Is Strainu willing to run the bot on a regular basis - say once a week to process articles which have been tagged for renaming? The sooner we start this the less work there will be to do... Railwayfan2005 (talk) 22:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot make any guarantees on running a bot regularly on en.wp, sorry. This project is not very interesting for me, so I only pass by when I don't find what I'm looking for in ro.wp. I could however run the bot for en.wp when I run it for ro.wp (about once every three months)--Strainu (talk) 10:38, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't sound too bad. What would need to be done (i.e. what tags would need to be added) in order for the bot to know which articles to fix? Also I suspect the bot would have to run under an administrator account, since in many cases (I'm assuming) it would have to delete an existing redirect before it could perform a page move.--Kotniski (talk) 11:40, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I've discovered (rediscovered actually, since I now notice it was already linked to above) this past discussion, which led to the redirects being created (from ș and ț forms to ş and ţ forms), so maybe the script that was used to do that could be adapted to now perform the moves? I'll drop User:Anomie a note. --Kotniski (talk) 11:47, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The page moves could easily enough be done with a bot, as long as consensus is demonstrated (post it at WP:VPR and ask the relevant projects for input) and a list of pages needing to be moved is generated. Note there is no need for the list to supply both the source and destination names, since it's just a simple replacement of 4 characters. Replacement of text within pages is less amenable to unattended bot action, as text in direct quotes, external link titles, and so on should generally not be changed. Anomie ⚔ 16:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LU goods yard closures

The information on goods yard closures is good thing to add to Underground stations (and anything touched by Brian Hardy is likely to be a reliable source); but please don't just put it in the infobox. It should primarily go in the article body text (there is nothing to prevent the date going in the infobox as well), and the reference should go against the mention in the text, to prevent the infobox from being clogged with templates that less-experienced users might assume were part of the infobox. See the amendments that I made to Chalfont & Latimer, Rickmansworth and Harrow-on-the-Hill. You may also notice that I removed the |accessdate= - this field is used for online, not printed, sources. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:50, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to go back and put the text in after I'd done all the boxes as the dates are in a convenient list... Railwayfan2005 (talk) 22:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello Railwayfan! I am really delighted of your articles about Czech railway units and locomotives. I would like to thank you this way for all the railway fans. Sorry for my bad English and good luck, --Midi7 (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help! Railwayfan2005 (talk) 22:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited River Ayr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaelic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:11, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, should be Scottish Gaelic.Railwayfan2005 (talk) 21:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. When you recently edited List of preserved Avonside locomotives, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NCB and Woolwich Arsenal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alan Keef may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|John Redden's Scrapyard, [Wellingborough]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:23, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Message received on german talkpage

Hi, I've written a (bilingual) message on your german talkpage. You can find it here: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Railwayfan2005#fehlende_Einzelnachweise. |FDMS 21:35, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of railway stations in Serbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bor, Vrbas, Parage, Stig, Palilula, Novo Selo, Rakovica, Kijevo, Jablanica, Ostrovica, Dimitrovgrad, Banjska, Tavankut, Dren, Palanka, Baluga, Kula, Žednik, Raška, Požega, Klenak, Orom, Gornji Breg, Grdelica, Crveni Krst, Ratkovo, Kalenić, Gruža, Mali Beograd, Prijevor, Resnik, Zavod, Bogaraš, Gradac, Rudnica, Lučina, Sušica, Samari, Jasenica, Rečica, Staro Selo, Brusnik, Korman, Timok, Rajac, Lipe, Beli Potok, Lipovica, Markovac, Poljice, Drenovac, Lučice, Dolac, Babin Potok, Branešci, Lanište, Brestovac, Trnjani, Vitkovac, Miloševo, Gramada, Cerovo, Lozno, Zagrađe and Crveni Breg

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irchester Narrow Gauge Railway Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stanhope. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC) dd[reply]

Loco in Doyles Scrapyard, Westhoughton

You made a list of Avonside locos and listed one in Doyles Scrapyard in Westhoughton. This image I took myself of the only loco there - File:Pretoria Pit Loco.jpg. Is it any help? plucas58 Plucas58 (talk) 01:21, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that's the correct loco according to [2]. Looks a little unloved at the moment...Railwayfan2005 (talk) 22:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Rail Class 01/5, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shipley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Rail Class 01/5, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ludgershall and Longtown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kempton Steam Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Barclay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tramcars of the Sheffield Tramway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GEC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Railwayfan2005. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Statfold Barn Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Meuse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Statfold Barn Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Barclay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stevington and Turvey Light Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woburn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of POLDI s.r.o.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on POLDI s.r.o. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 22:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poldi s.r.o. (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article would need multiple independent reliable sources that have written substantial coverage of the company. The first reference is to a discussion forum where presumably anybody can write anything, so that's not considered a reliable source. The second reference is to the company's website which is not an independent source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Poldi s.r.o. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Railwayfan2005, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Poldi s.r.o. has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Poldi s.r.o.. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:35, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Railwayfan2005. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Poldi s.r.o. concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Poldi s.r.o., a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Poldi s.r.o.

Hello, Railwayfan2005. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Poldi s.r.o.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Railwayfan2005. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alan Keef, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grande Terre. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of British Rail Class 87 locomotives

added links pointing to Iron Duke, City of Liverpool, Coeur de Lion, George Reynolds and Black Douglas

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Black Douglas, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ——Serial Number 54129 17:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not original research, the name of the locomotive is cited on List of British Rail Class 87 locomotives linked from the main page. Please revert your edit. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 20:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ Haydock, David. European Handbook No. 1 Benelux Railways Locomotives & Coaching Stock (Fifth Edition ed.). Sheffield, UK: Platform 5 Publishing Ltd. ISBN 978 1 902336 64 0. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

[PlatFiveBenelux-1] Haydock, David. European Handbook No. 1 Benelux Railways Locomotives & Coaching Stock (Fifth Edition ed.). Sheffield, UK: Platform 5 Publishing Ltd. ISBN 978 1 902336 64 0. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

[1]