Talk:List of Army Cadet Force units

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 October 2008. The result of the discussion was No consensus..

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 February 2012. The result of the discussion was No consensus..

Military history: British / European CL‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

CL

This article has been rated as CL-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors reviewed a version of this article for copy editing. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

Moved

This list has been moved from the page Army Cadet Force as a proposed move, in its current form it still need to be worked on, please see the article on Air Training Corps for how this should be achieved.--Pandaplodder (talk) 22:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to see this deleted which is what I tried to do originally, this list has no place on wikipedia Pandaplodder (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from WP:IDONTLIKEIT, would you care to explain why? Andy Dingley (talk) 22:04, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be totally original research.--Charles (talk) 23:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

I see that this article is proposed for deletion. I suggest that its moved back to Army Cadet Force. When we have more links and references to how regions were created, then we can look into moving this to its own article at a later date. Jez ☎ ✉ ✍ 16:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please help this article

This article was up for AfD, and has been saved for the foreseeable future, due to NO CONSENSUS It needs help!!! please help me find references to books, or even the online ACF detachments so we can create an article that is worthwhile. Currently its just a list of UK Places which have a ACF detachments. It needs:

History of when the ACF county was formed
any famous cadets from the area
Associated British Army regiments.

Your help in this would be greatly appreciated Jez ☎ ✉ ✍ 13:28, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

What this article really needs is references to the information contained here. Since the AfD what has been happening is exactly what I predicted would happen from similar articles that used to list Scout Troops. An IP editor comes along, adds information about units amalgamating or removes information about units closing and so one - all with NO reference to sources that report this information. These lists are unsupportable as they are always just full of original research. --Bduke (Discussion) 23:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see nobody has answered this, yet the edits continue. If the one reference is OK, why are people changing the article? If the one reference is not OK, why are people not adding other references for their edits? --Bduke (Discussion) 11:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of Army Cadet Force units. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090519215824/http://www.hantsandiowacf.org.uk/ to http://www.hantsandiowacf.org.uk/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090616083716/http://www.oxonacf.org.uk/ to http://www.oxonacf.org.uk/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090124235501/http://www.armycadets.com/map/ to http://www.armycadets.com/map

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Whilst a work in progress, this article is now in the main referenced and up-to-date, and matches the publicly available data. As has been brought up a few times here, where changes are made that do not match those references, should be reverted, as they will not be verifiable. The biggest threat, in that respect, is Cadets making edits based on hearsay and incomplete information! Davix (talk) 19:51, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]