Talk:Linsear Write

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Readability Studio

My company added this article to WP and we had a simple link to our software product which includes this test. As far as I know, no other software offers this test, so including this link may have actually been useful to some readers.

If this is considered as some sort of violation of policy then that is fine and I apologize, although I fail to see why our software product is being singled out. A number of our competitors (e.g, KWord, MS Word, GNU Style) are listed in your readability test articles, but only our product is being seen as "spam" for some odd reason and has been systematically removed. It was never our intention to abuse WP, we simply wished to add and improve your readability test articles and then offer links to our product for those interested in readability software. The only reason we thought of doing this is because it was quite clear that other software packages were already mentioned in these articles.

At any rate, if this is the case then I wish to ask for this page to be removed and we will begin housing readability test documentation on our own website. -- B madden 21:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Linsear Write. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]