Talk:Line feed

This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 28 July 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

Standard line ending for network traffic

The article says that

CRLF was eventually adopted as the standard line ending for network traffic, a decision which, in retrospect, is generally considered to be a mistake.

Why? Who said this? --surueña 11:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.rfc-editor.org/EOLstory.txt TMC1221 01:16, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page simply repeats what's on Newline and not as well, so I am merging it. Illuminatedwax 06:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate redirect

@Tom.Reding:The redirect of LF to NL is inappropriate. If Line Feed is not notable enough to warrant a separate article, then the redirect should be removed, unless there is a line feed section in another article to which it can point. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 14:15, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chatul: I'm not the editor you're looking for; Onel5969 is. Regardless, your assertion "If Line Feed is not notable enough to warrant a separate article, then the redirect should be removed" is incorrect. Please see WP:R#DELETE for valid reasons for removing redirects (it sounds like you've misread and/or misunderstood #10). If you wish to further expound on LF, beyond what is currently written on NL, please edit NL. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 14:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping Tom.Reding - and Chatul if you still feel the redirect is inappropriate, after reading the link Tom.Reding gave you above, the appropriate forum is WP:RFD. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:56, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]